SSSAJ
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text Free
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (2)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Wang, H.
Right arrow Articles by Persaud, N.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Wang, H.
Right arrow Articles by Persaud, N.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Wang, H.
Right arrow Articles by Persaud, N.
Related Collections
Right arrow Soil Methods/Instrumentation
Right arrow Laboratory Column Studies
Right arrow Evolution
Right arrow Predictive soil mapping
Right arrow Experiment Design

Miscible Displacement of Initial Solute Distributions in Laboratory Columns

H. Wanga,* and N. Persaudb

a Soil and Water Science Dep., Univ. of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32611
b Dep. of Crop and Soil Environmental Sciences, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, VA 24061-0404



View larger version (39K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1. Schematic of the laboratory column system that was developed for conducting the miscible displacement experiments with a free-inlet boundary, showing experimental column system (I), injection assembly (II), and detail of a needle (III).

 


View larger version (25K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2. Breakthrough curves calculated using the convection-dispersion equation for treatments where the injected solute was assumed to be normally distributed with 2{sigma} of 5, 10, 20, and 40% of L. Treatment denoted as 0% represents an injected solute distribution described as a Dirac delta function. In all cases, the total mass of solute injected = 1 mmol, porosity = 0.33, and L = 37.5 cm.

 


View larger version (26K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 3. Breakthrough curves calculated using the convection-dispersion equation subject to different boundary conditions for treatments where the injected solute was assumed to be normally distributed with 2{sigma} of 5, 10, 20, and 40% of L. Treatment denoted as 0% represents an injected solute distribution described as a Dirac delta function. In all cases, the total mass of solute injected = 1 mmol, porosity = 0.33, L = 37.5 cm, and Pe = 5.

 


View larger version (16K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 4. Experimental breakthrough curves corresponding to the replicate with fitted {kappa}-value closest to the mean value for the different injection volume treatments in Table 1.

 





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Crop Science
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Vadose Zone Journal
Journal of Plant Registrations Journal of
Environmental Quality
The Plant Genome
Copyright © 2004 by the Soil Science Society of America.