SSSAJ
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text Free
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (11)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Rachman, A.
Right arrow Articles by Alberts, E. E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Rachman, A.
Right arrow Articles by Alberts, E. E.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Rachman, A.
Right arrow Articles by Alberts, E. E.
Related Collections
Right arrow Hydraulic Conductivity
Right arrow Plant and Soil Interactions
Right arrow Soil Conservation

Soil Hydraulic Properties Influenced by Stiff-Stemmed Grass Hedge Systems

Achmad Rachmana, S. H. Andersonb,*, C. J. Gantzerb and E. E. Albertsc

a Indonesia Center for Soil and Agroclimate Research and Development, Jl. Ir. H. Juanda 98 Bogor, Indonesia 16123
b 302 Anheuser-Busch Natural Resources Bldg., Dep. of Soil, Environmental and Atmospheric Sciences, Univ. of Missouri, Columbia, MO 65211
c USDA-ARS, 268 Agricultural Eng. Building, Columbia, MO 65211



View larger version (10K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1. Schematic sketch of grass hedge system illustrating the width of hedge (W1), width of cropped area (W2), original soil slope (So), and sampling positions (grass hedge; deposition zone, 0.5-m upslope of the hedge; and row crop 7-m upslope of the hedge).

 


View larger version (31K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2. Effects of position and depth on (A) silt content, (B) clay content, (C) organic matter, and (D) bulk density. GH = Grass hedge; RC = Row crop; DZ = Deposition zone. Bars indicate LSD(0.05) values.

 


View larger version (36K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 3. Effects of position on soil water retention at depths of (A) 0 to 10 cm, (B) 10 to 20 cm, (C) 20 to 30 cm, and (D) 30 to 40 cm. GH = Grass hedge; RC = Row crop; DZ = Deposition zone. Bars indicate LSD(0.05) values that are the same for all four depths at a water potential. LSD values are presented for the first two water potentials; other values were not determined due to heterogeneity of variance among positions.

 


View larger version (29K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 4. Effects of position and depth on the distribution of (A) macropores, (B) coarse mesopores, (C) fine mesopores, and (D) micropores. GH = Grass hedge; RC = Row crop; DZ = Deposition zone. Macropores (>1000 µm diam.), coarse mesopores (60–1000 µm diam.), fine mesopores (10–60 µm diam.), and micropores (<10 µm diam.). Bars indicate LSD(0.05) values.

 


View larger version (16K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 5. Effects of position and depth on saturated hydraulic conductivity (Ksat). GH = Grass hedge; RC = Row crop; DZ = Deposition zone. Bar indicates LSD(0.05) value.

 





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Crop Science
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Vadose Zone Journal
Journal of Plant Registrations Journal of
Environmental Quality
The Plant Genome
Copyright © 2004 by the Soil Science Society of America.