SSSAJ
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text Free
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (9)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Shukla, M. K.
Right arrow Articles by Ebinger, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Shukla, M. K.
Right arrow Articles by Ebinger, M.
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Shukla, M. K.
Right arrow Articles by Ebinger, M.
Related Collections
Right arrow Soil Hydrology
Right arrow Carbon Sequestration
Right arrow Soil Physics

Physical and Hydrological Characteristics of Reclaimed Minesoils in Southeastern Ohio

M. K. Shuklaa,*, R. Lala, J. Underwoodb and M. Ebingerc

a Carbon Management and Sequestration Center, The Ohio State Univ., 2021 Coffey Rd., Columbus, OH 43210-1085
b School of Natural Resources, FAES, The Ohio State Univ., 2021 Coffey Rd., Columbus, OH 43210-1085
c Los Alamos National Lab., Los Alamos, NM 87545



View larger version (23K):

[in a new window]
  		Fig. 1. Schematic of the plots at both the experimental sites (a) undisturbed soil (UMS) and (b) reclaimed minesoil (RMS). Soil samples were collected for the 0- to 10-cm depth from (a) and the 0- to 10- and the 10- to 20-cm depths for (b). The FL1, FL2 and FL3 are the three rates of fertilizer application in RMS at both sites.

 


View larger version (14K):

[in a new window]
  		Fig. 2. Mean and standard deviations of soil water content ({theta}) at different suctions for an unmined control (UMS) and three-fertilizer treatment (FL1, FL2, and FL3) in reclaimed minesoil in Vinton County site (VCS).

 


View larger version (14K):

[in a new window]
  		Fig. 3. Mean and standard deviations of soil water content ({theta}) at different suctions for an unmined control (UMS) and three-fertilizer treatment (FL1, FL2, and FL3) in reclaimed minesoil in Jackson County site (JCS).

 




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Crop Science
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education		 Vadose Zone Journal
Journal of Plant Registrations Journal of
Environmental Quality		 The Plant Genome
Copyright © 2004 by the Soil Science Society of America.