SSSAJ
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text Free
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by De Wever, H.
Right arrow Articles by Merckx, R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by De Wever, H.
Right arrow Articles by Merckx, R.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by De Wever, H.
Right arrow Articles by Merckx, R.
Related Collections
Right arrow Global Change
Right arrow Microbial Processes
Right arrow Nitrogen

A System for Studying the Dynamics of Gaseous Emissions in Response to Changes in Soil Matric Potential

Helene De Wevera,*, David T. Strongb and Roel Merckxb

a Vito, Boeretang 200, 2400 Mol, Belgium
b Lab. for Soil and Water Management, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Kasteelpark Arenberg 20, 3001 Heverlee, Belgium



View larger version (34K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1. Incubation system showing the union of incubation chambers with the automated gas sampling system. Incubation Chamber 1 is selected by the 10-port valve, which allows gaseous recirculation by the membrane pump before sampling by the sample loops.

 


View larger version (19K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2. Relationship between soil water contents and matric potential, established for four soils of the Lovenjoel transect. Each point represents three replicate soils and three determinations for a given matric potential.

 


View larger version (20K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 3. Comparison of water release curves determined with traditional ceramic plate and pressure chambers or with the incubation chambers. For the less structured soils each point represents the mean of eight duplicate soils, for the well-structured soils the mean of six duplicate soils.

 


View larger version (24K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 4. Cumulative production of N gases and CO2 (average of three replicates) during anaerobic incubation of Soil 2 preincubated at –75 kPa. The arrows indicate the increases in matric potential.

 


View larger version (50K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 5. Partially oxidized species of gaseous N (NO + N2O) as a proportion of total gaseous N emissions. Legend refers to matric potential during anaerobic incubation and x-axis refers to aerobic preincubation matric potential.

 


View larger version (31K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 6. Average production rates of (a) NO, (b) N2O (c) N2, and (d) CO2 in soils anaerobically incubated during 7 d at three different matric potentials, after a 90-d aerobic preincubation at –75 kPa.

 


View larger version (32K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 7. Average effect of incubation matric potential on (a) total gaseous N emission, (b) electrons consumed (c) NO + N2O as a proportion of total N gases, and (d) electrons consumed per unit CO2 produced. Both soils were preincubated aerobically at –75 kPa and then incubated anaerobically for 7 d at three different matric potentials.

 





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Crop Science
Vadose Zone Journal Journal of Plant Registrations
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Journal of
Environmental Quality
Copyright © 2004 by the Soil Science Society of America.