SSSAJ
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text Free
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (16)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Si, B. C.
Right arrow Articles by Farrell, R. E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Si, B. C.
Right arrow Articles by Farrell, R. E.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Si, B. C.
Right arrow Articles by Farrell, R. E.
Related Collections
Right arrow Soil Hydrology
Right arrow Spatial Variability
Right arrow Spatial Distribution

Scale-Dependent Relationship between Wheat Yield and Topographic Indices

A Wavelet Approach

Bing Cheng Si* and Richard E. Farrell

Dep. of Soil Science, Univ. of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, Canada, S7N 5A8



View larger version (30K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1. The Harr wavelet and the Mexican hat wavelets for different scales and translation. (a) The Harr wavelet for scale = 1 (solid line) and 0.5 (dashed line); (b) the Mexican hat wavelets for scale = 1 (solid line) and 0.5 (dashed line); (c) the Harr wavelets for location = 0 (solid line) and 2 (dashed line); and (d) the Mexican hat wavelets for location = 0 (solid line) and 4 (dashed line).

 


View larger version (31K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2. Measured elevation, curvature, upslope length, the wetness index of Beven and Kirkby (1979), and grain yield as a function of distance along the transect.

 


View larger version (58K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 3. Local (a) wavelet spectrum and (b) global wavelet power spectrum of grain yield. Gray scale is expressed as the natural logarithm of the local wavelet spectrum. The dashed line in (b) is the power spectra of a red noise at a confidence level of 99%.

 


View larger version (54K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 4. Local (a) wavelet spectrum and (b) global wavelet power spectrum of upslope length. Gray scale is expressed as the natural logarithm of the local wavelet spectrum. The dashed line in (b) is the power spectra of a red noise at a confidence level of 99%.

 


View larger version (60K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 5. Local (a) wavelet spectrum and (b) global wavelet power spectrum of the wetness index of Beven and Kirkby (1979). Gray scale is expressed as the natural logarithm of the local wavelet spectrum. The dashed line in (b) is the power spectra of a red noise at a confidence level of 99%.

 


View larger version (56K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 6. Local (a) wavelet cross-spectrum and (b) global wavelet cross-spectrum of grain yield and upslope length. Gray scale is expressed as the natural logarithm of the local wavelet spectrum. The dashed line in (b) is the power spectra of a red noise at a confidence level of 99%.

 


View larger version (59K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 7. Local (a) wavelet cross-spectrum and (b) global wavelet cross-spectrum of grain yield and the wetness index of Beven and Kirkby (1979). Gray scale is expressed as the natural logarithm of the local wavelet spectrum. The dashed line in (b) is the power spectra of a red noise at a confidence level of 99%.

 





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Crop Science
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Vadose Zone Journal
Journal of Plant Registrations Journal of
Environmental Quality
The Plant Genome
Copyright © 2004 by the Soil Science Society of America.