SSSAJ
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text Free
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (15)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Rochette, P.
Right arrow Articles by Lévesque, G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Rochette, P.
Right arrow Articles by Lévesque, G.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Rochette, P.
Right arrow Articles by Lévesque, G.
Related Collections
Right arrow Nitrogen
Right arrow Plant and Soil Interactions
Right arrow Global Change

Emissions of N2O from Alfalfa and Soybean Crops in Eastern Canada

Philippe Rochette*, Denis A. Angers, Gilles Bélanger, Martin H. Chantigny, Danielle Prévost and Gabriel Lévesque

Soils and Crops Research and Development Centre, Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada, 2560 Hochelaga Blvd., Sainte-Foy, QC, Canada, G1V 2J3



View larger version (16K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1. Daily rainfall during the study at the Harlaka site near Québec City, Canada.

 


View larger version (30K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2. Soil water-filled pore space (7.5-cm depth) under alfalfa (Medicago sativa L.), timothy (Phleum pratense L.), and soybean (Glycine max L.) at the Chapais and Harlaka sites. Arrows indicate alfalfa, timothy, and soybean harvests. Bars represent the LSD (P = 0.05) values for the comparison of crop types at each sampling date; LSD values are only presented when the analysis of variance indicated a significant (P < 0.05) effect of the crop types.

 


View larger version (29K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 3. Soil ammonium content (7.5-cm depth) under alfalfa (Medicago sativa L.), timothy (Phleum pratense L.), and soybean (Glycine max L.) at the Chapais and Harlaka sites. Arrows indicate alfalfa, timothy, and soybean harvests. Bars represent the LSD (P = 0.05) values for the comparison of crop types at each sampling date; LSD values are only presented when the analysis of variance indicated a significant (P < 0.05) effect of the crop types.

 


View larger version (32K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 4. Soil nitrate content (7.5-cm depth) under alfalfa (Medicago sativa L.), timothy (Phleum pratense L.), and soybean (Glycine max L.) at the Chapais and Harlaka sites. Arrows indicate alfalfa, timothy, and soybean harvests. Bars represent the LSD (P = 0.05) values for the comparison of crop types at each sampling date; LSD values are only presented when the analysis of variance indicated a significant (P < 0.05) effect of the crop types.

 


View larger version (30K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 5. Water-extractable organic carbon (WEOC) (7.5-cm depth) under alfalfa (Medicago sativa L.), timothy (Phleum pratense L.), and soybean (Glycine max L.) at the Chapais and Harlaka sites. Arrows indicate alfalfa, timothy, and soybean harvests. Bars represent the LSD (P = 0.05) values for the comparison of crop types at each sampling date; LSD values are only presented when the analysis of variance indicated a significant (P < 0.05) effect of the crop types.

 


View larger version (28K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 6. Nitrous oxide concentration in the soil gas phase (7.5-cm depth) under alfalfa (Medicago sativa L.), timothy (Phleum pratense L.), and soybean (Glycine max L.) at the Chapais and Harlaka sites. Arrows indicate alfalfa, timothy, and soybean harvests. Bars represent the LSD (P = 0.05) values for the comparison of crop types at each sampling date; LSD values are only presented when the analysis of variance indicated a significant (P < 0.05) effect of the crop types.

 


View larger version (28K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 7. Soil-surface N2O fluxes under alfalfa (Medicago sativa L.), timothy (Phleum pratense L.), and soybean (Glycine max L.) at the Chapais and Harlaka sites. Arrows indicate alfalfa, timothy, and soybean harvests. Bars represent the LSD (P = 0.05) values for the comparison of crop types at each sampling date; LSD values are only presented when the analysis of variance indicated a significant (P < 0.05) effect of the crop types.

 





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Crop Science
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Vadose Zone Journal
Journal of Plant Registrations Journal of
Environmental Quality
The Plant Genome
Copyright © 2004 by the Soil Science Society of America.