SSSAJ
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text Free
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (5)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Aydin, M.
Right arrow Articles by Kilic, S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Aydin, M.
Right arrow Articles by Kilic, S.
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Aydin, M.
Right arrow Articles by Kilic, S.
Related Collections
Right arrow Hydraulic Conductivity
Right arrow Soil Surface Chemistry
Right arrow Experiment Design

Dependence of Zeta Potential and Soil Hydraulic Conductivity on Adsorbed Cation and Aqueous Phase Properties

Mehmet Aydin*,a, Tomohisa Yanob and Seref Kilica

a Faculty of Agriculture, Dep. of Soil Science, Mustafa Kemal Univ., Antakya, 31040 Turkey
b Arid Land Research Center, Tottori Univ, 1390 Hamasaka, Tottori, 680-0001 Japan



View larger version (30K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1. Schematic diagram of electrophoresis apparatus (U-tube).

 


View larger version (21K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2. Variation of electrophoretic mobility (EM) and corresponding zeta potential ({zeta}p ) of Ariake soil (AS) and Kzyl-Orda soil (KS) clays as a function of Na percentage (the complementary ion was Ca).

 


View larger version (19K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 3. Effect of pH on electrophoretic mobility (EM) and corresponding zeta potential ({zeta}p) of Ariake soil (AS) and Kzyl-Orda soil (KS) clay particles in 0.01 M NaCl-treated suspensions.

 


View larger version (22K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 4. Electrophoretic mobility (EM) and corresponding zeta potential ({zeta}p) of Ariake soil (AS) and Kzyl-Orda soil (KS) clays versus electrolyte concentration of NaCl.

 


View larger version (16K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 5. Hydraulic conductivity versus exchangeable sodium percentage for Ariake (AS) and Kzyl-Orda (KS) clay/sand mixtures (distilled water was applied to columns).

 


View larger version (15K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 6. Hydraulic conductivity as a function of pH for Ariake (AS) and Kzyl-Orda (KS) Na-clay/sand mixtures under 0.01 M NaCl solution.

 


View larger version (15K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 7. Hydraulic conductivity versus electrolyte concentration of NaCl for Ariake (AS) and Kzyl-Orda (KS) clay/sand mixtures at exchangeable sodium percentage 100.

 


View larger version (22K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 8. Relationship between zeta potential ({zeta}p ) of clay particles and hydraulic conductivity of clay/sand mixtures for Ariake (AS) and Kzyl-Orda (KS) samples.

 





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Crop Science
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Vadose Zone Journal
Journal of Plant Registrations Journal of
Environmental Quality
The Plant Genome
Copyright © 2004 by the Soil Science Society of America.