SSSAJ
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text Free
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (3)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Savin, M. C.
Right arrow Articles by Amador, J. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Savin, M. C.
Right arrow Articles by Amador, J. A.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Savin, M. C.
Right arrow Articles by Amador, J. A.
Related Collections
Right arrow Soil Microbiology
Right arrow Microbial Processes
Right arrow Soil Biology

Microbial and Microfaunal Community Dynamics in Artificial and Lumbricus terrestris (L.) Burrows

Mary C. Savin*,a,b, Josef H. Görresa and José A. Amadora

a Lab. of Soil Ecology and Microbiology, 024 Coastal Institute in Kingston, Univ. of Rhode Island, Kingston, RI 02881
b Dep. of Crop, Soil, and Environmental Sciences, 115 Plant Science Building, Univ. of Arkansas, Fayetteville, AR 72701



View larger version (24K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1. Active/total fungal biomass and active/total microbial biomass in artificial burrows not lined with corn leaf litter (ARTF); control soil (CTRL); artificial burrows lined with corn leaf litter (LEAF); and L. terrestris burrows (WORM) treatments as a function of incubation time. Bars represent one standard deviation (n = 3). Asterisks indicate dates that the active/total ratios are significantly higher in WORM soil than in any other treatment (* is for P < 0.05, ** is for P < 0.01). On Week 7, the active/total microbial biomass ratios for both LEAF and WORM soil were higher than for CTRL and ARTF.

 


View larger version (18K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2. Bacterivores, fungivores, Tylenchids, plant parasitic and omnivore/predaceous nematodes in artificial burrows lined with corn leaf litter (LEAF) and L. terrestris burrows (WORM) treatments as a function of incubation time. Bars represent one standard deviation (n = 2 or 3). Asterisks indicate dates that values are significantly higher in LEAF than in WORM soil (P < 0.05).

 


View larger version (19K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 3. Log transformed abundance of total protozoa, flagellates, ciliates, and amoebae in artificial burrows lined with corn leaf litter (LEAF); and L. terrestris burrows (WORM) treatments as a function of incubation time. Bars represent one standard deviation (n = 3). Asterisks indicate dates that values in WORM soil are significantly higher than in LEAF soil (P < 0.05).

 





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Crop Science
Vadose Zone Journal Journal of Plant Registrations
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Journal of
Environmental Quality
Copyright © 2004 by the Soil Science Society of America.