SSSAJ
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text Free
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Bégin, L.
Right arrow Articles by Caron, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Bégin, L.
Right arrow Articles by Caron, J.
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Bégin, L.
Right arrow Articles by Caron, J.
Related Collections
Right arrow Laboratory Column Studies
Right arrow Other Contaminants
Right arrow Other Environmental Contamination

Evaluation of the Fluoride Retardation Factor in Unsaturated and Undisturbed Soil Columns

Louis Bégin, Josée Fortin* and Jean Caron

Département des Sols et de Génie Agroalimentaire, FSAA, Université Laval, Québec, QC, Canada, G1K 7P4



View larger version (15K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1. Column experiment setup.

 


View larger version (13K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2. Bromide and F breakthrough curves obtained with a tension table. The solid and dashed lines represent the CDE model adjusted to the Br and F breakthrough curves, respectively.

 


View larger version (23K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 3. Examples of Br (diamonds) and F (circles) breakthrough curves obtained in each soil layer. Three columns were used for each soil layer, except for Site B (40–50 cm), where two columns were used. The solid lines represent the CDE model adjusted to the Br and F breakthrough curves. The CLT model is not represented but is nearly indistinguishable from the CDE model. Two F breakthrough curves are presented for Site C (20–40 cm) to show the strong variation of F retention observed in different columns of that soil layer. No F was detected in the effluent of the columns of Sites A, B, and D.

 


View larger version (26K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 4. Examples of F accumulation profiles in each soil layer. Three columns were used for each soil layer, except for Site B (40–50 cm), where two columns were used. Data points represent the increase in F total resident concentration. The vertical dotted line is at 0 mg F L-1 soil. The solid and dotted curves represent the CDE and CLT models adjusted to the accumulation profile, respectively.

 





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Crop Science
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Vadose Zone Journal
Journal of Plant Registrations Journal of
Environmental Quality
The Plant Genome
Copyright © 2003 by the Soil Science Society of America.