SSSAJ
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text Free
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (11)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Quideau, S. A.
Right arrow Articles by Chadwick, O. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Quideau, S. A.
Right arrow Articles by Chadwick, O. A.
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Quideau, S. A.
Right arrow Articles by Chadwick, O. A.
Related Collections
Right arrow Isotopes
Right arrow Soil Organic Matter
Right arrow Forest Soils

Natural Isotopic Distribution in Soil Surface Horizons Differentiated by Vegetation

S. A. Quideau*,a, R. C. Grahamb, X. Fengc and O. A. Chadwickd

a Dep. of Renewable Resources, Univ. of Alberta, Edmonton AB, Canada T6G 2E3
b Soil and Water Sciences Program, Dep. of Environmental Sciences, Univ. of California, Riverside, CA 92521
c Dep. of Earth Sciences, Dartmouth College, Hanover, NH 03755
d Dep. of Geography, Univ. of California, Santa Barbara, CA 93106



View larger version (18K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1. Differences in (a) {delta}13C and (b) {delta}15N values ({per thousand}) among physical fractions and whole soil (WS) samples at the oak and pine lysimeters. Zero refers to WS and a positive difference corresponds to the given physical fraction being enriched in the heavier isotope as compared with WS; SA = sand + coarse and medium silt (5–2000 µm), FL = floatables (50–2000 µm), FS = fine silt (2–5 µm), and CL = clay (<2 µm). *indicates significance between physical fraction and WS at p = 0.10 and **at p = 0.05. Error bars represent standard errors.

 


View larger version (31K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2. Differences in {delta}13C values ({per thousand}) between chemical residues and samples before extraction at the oak and pine lysimeters. Zero refers to the original material before extraction and a positive difference corresponds to the given chemical residue being enriched in the heavier isotope as compared to the original material; LIT = litter, FL = floatables (50–2000 µm), FS = fine silt (2–5 µm), and CL = clay (<2 µm). *indicates significance between chemical residue and the original material at p = 0.10, **at p = 0.05, and ***at p = 0.01. Error bars represent standard errors.

 


View larger version (30K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 3. Differences in {delta}13C values ({per thousand}) in samples before extraction and chemical residues between the oak and pine lysimeters with LIT = litter, FL = floatables (50–2000 µm), FS = fine silt (2–5 µm), and CL = clay (<2 µm). Note that all fractions for the pine were more 13C enriched than that for the oak, as represented by positive values on the graph. *indicates significance between vegetation types at p = 0.05, **at p = 0.01, and ***at p = 0.001. Error bars represent standard errors.

 





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Crop Science
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Vadose Zone Journal
Journal of Plant Registrations Journal of
Environmental Quality
The Plant Genome
Copyright © 2003 by the Soil Science Society of America.