SSSAJ
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text Free
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (18)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Pumpanen, J.
Right arrow Articles by Hari, P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Pumpanen, J.
Right arrow Articles by Hari, P.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Pumpanen, J.
Right arrow Articles by Hari, P.
Related Collections
Right arrow Soil Physics
Right arrow Soil Models
Right arrow Soil Organic Matter

A Process-Based Model for Predicting Soil Carbon Dioxide Efflux and Concentration

Jukka Pumpanen*, Hannu Ilvesniemi and Pertti Hari

Dep. of Forest Ecology, P.O. Box 27, FIN-00014 University of Helsinki, Finland



View larger version (27K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1. A schematic presentation of the simulation model. The CO2 production in each soil layer consists of microbial respiration (rm) and root respiration (rr), which are controlled by temperature (T) and by soil-water content ({theta}v). Carbon dioxide moves between the layers by diffusion and the CO2 flux (J) depends on the total porosity of soil (Eo), the soil-water content and the thickness of the layers (l) as well as the concentration gradient between the layers. The CO2 fluxes are denoted by thick arrows, and thin arrows represent information between parameters and processes. The amount of CO2 in a soil horizon is denoted by C and soil layers are denoted with capital letters O, A, B, and C. In the figure, processes are presented only for O- and A-horizons.

 


View larger version (21K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2. The relation between soil respiration and soil-water content in O-, A-, B-, and C-horizons. In the model, the maximum value of the moisture factor f({theta}v) is limited to 1.

 


View larger version (22K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 3. Flow-chart of the program. The initial values of soil parameters are given to the program. Then values of measured ambient air CO2 concentration, soil temperature and soil moisture of each soil layer are imported from the data file. First, the CO2 flux between the layers is calculated. Next the respiration of each soil layer is calculated. Then new values for CO2 concentrations in each layer are obtained using calculated respiration and flux values. New ambient air CO2 concentration, temperature, and moisture values are imported from the data file until the end of the file has been reached.

 


View larger version (19K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 4. Measured and predicted daily average CO2 effluxes from the soil surface over 19 mo at the reference site from May 1998 to November 1999 excluding the winter months from December 1998 to April 1999. The CO2 efflux was measured continuously by two automatically operating chambers, and the efflux presented is an average of the two chambers.

 


View larger version (28K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 5. (a) Soil temperature (°C) was measured by temperature sensors installed permanently in the O-, A-, B-, and C-horizons. (b) Soil-water content (m3 m-3) was measured by TDR probes installed permanently in corresponding soil horizons and denoted with similar symbols. Values presented in the figure are daily averages of five temperature sensors and TDR probes installed in each soil horizon. When the soil freezes in O-horizon in late November, the TDR does not measure the volumetric water content correctly.

 


View larger version (22K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 6. The relation between measured and predicted CO2 efflux calculated with the model (a) without moisture factor and (b) with moisture factor. Daily average values are shown in the figure. Simulation without the moisture factor shows a clear over estimation of the efflux.

 


View larger version (18K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 7. Simulated respiration in the O-, A-, B-, and C-horizons over 19 mo at the reference site from May 1998 to November 1999 excluding the winter months from December 1998 to April 1999.

 


View larger version (34K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 8. (a) Measured and predicted daily average values for soil CO2 concentration in the O-, A-, B-, and C-horizons over 19 mo at the reference site from May 1998 to November 1999 excluding the winter months from December 1998 to April 1999. Measured values for soil CO2 concentration are an average of air samples taken from five permanently installed gas samplers in each horizon. The coefficient of variation of the samples ranged, on average, from 0.37 in the humus layer to 0.51 in the B-horizon. (b), (c), (d), and (e) measured and predicted daily average CO2 concentrations plotted on xy–plot for O-, A-, B-, and C-horizons, respectively.

 





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Crop Science
Vadose Zone Journal Journal of Plant Registrations
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Journal of
Environmental Quality
Copyright © 2003 by the Soil Science Society of America.