HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Abstract Full Text Free Full Text (PDF) Free Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in ISI Web of Science Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (12) Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Suleiman, A. A. Articles by Ritchie, J. T. Search for Related Content PubMed Articles by Suleiman, A. A. Articles by Ritchie, J. T. Agricola Articles by Suleiman, A. A. Articles by Ritchie, J. T. Related Collections Agroclimatology Evapotranspiration Soil Hydrology

Modeling Soil Water Redistribution during Second-Stage Evaporation

^a Center for Atomoshperic Sciences, Hampton University, Hampton, VA 23668
^b Department of Crop and Soil Sciences, Plant and Soil Sciences Building, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI 48824-1325

View larger version (13K): [in a new window]   Fig. 1. Soil water profiles with different C values.

View larger version (29K): [in a new window]   Fig. 2. Daily solar radiation (SR), maximum (Tmax) and minimum (Tmin) air temperatures, and rainfall (R) from DOY 200 to 280 in 1997.

View larger version (21K): [in a new window]   Fig. 3. Relationships between and dul of laboratory soils (eight soils: Loamy and Sandy loam soils from this study and six soils from Rose [1968b]) and mean soils.

View larger version (20K): [in a new window]   Fig. 4. Relationships between a and b with dul for laboratory soils (eight soils: Loamy and Sandy loam soils from this study and six soils from Rose [1968b]) and mean soils.

View larger version (34K): [in a new window]   Fig. 5. Measured and simulated soil water content during second-stage evaporation.

View larger version (15K): [in a new window]   Fig. 6. Measured and simulated cumulative evaporation of loam and sandy loam soils during second-stage evaporation.

View larger version (19K): [in a new window]   Fig. 7. Soil water content profiles of 60-cm columns of loamy and sandy loam soils vs. Boltzmann transform during second-stage evaporation.

View larger version (30K): [in a new window]   Fig. 8. Soil water content profiles at six depths of sandy loam soil.

View larger version (20K): [in a new window]   Fig. 9. Measured and simulated soil water content of a bare soil in Lansing field during second-stage evaporation.

View larger version (21K): [in a new window]   Fig. 10. Soil water content profiles of 150-cm columns of loamy soil during second-stage evaporation.

View larger version (21K): [in a new window]   Fig. 11. Soil water content profiles of 150-cm columns of sandy loam soil during second-stage evaporation.

View larger version (24K): [in a new window]   Fig. 12. Soil water content profiles of 150-cm columns of loamy and sandy loam soils vs. Boltzmann transform during second-stage evaporation.

View larger version (17K): [in a new window]   Fig. 13. Measured and simulated cumulative evaporation of loam and sandy loam soils during second-stage evaporation.