SSSAJ
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text Free
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (3)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Feng, G. L.
Right arrow Articles by Letey, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Feng, G. L.
Right arrow Articles by Letey, J.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Feng, G. L.
Right arrow Articles by Letey, J.
Related Collections
Right arrow Irrigation
Right arrow Other Models
Right arrow Plant and Environment Interactions
Right arrow Plant and Soil Interactions

Evaluation of a Model for Irrigation Management Under Saline Conditions

I. Effects on Plant Growth

G. L. Fenga, A. Meirib and J. Letey*,a

a Soil and Water Science Unit, Univ. of California, Riverside, CA 92521
b Inst. of Soils, Water, and Environmental Sci., Volcani Center, ARO, P.O. Box 6, Bet Dagan, Israel



View larger version (27K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1. The root distribution as a function of time after planting used in the simulations.

 


View larger version (21K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2. The simulated relative yield for the various irrigation intervals and irrigation water salinities for two years. The water salinities in dS m-1 were S1 (1.7), S2 (4.0), S3 (5.3), S4 (7.9) and S5 (10.2).

 


View larger version (18K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 3. Comparison of measured and simulated relative yields assuming unstressed yield equal to 3.0 and 3.1 Mg ha-1.

 


View larger version (22K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 4. The root-weighted average matric and osmotic heads prior to irrigation as a function of time for the 3.5-d irrigation interval and irrigation water salinities of 1.7 dS m-1 (S1) and 10.2 dS m-1 (S5).

 


View larger version (20K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 5. The root-weighted average matric and osmotic heads prior to irrigation as a function of time for the 14-d irrigation interval and irrigation water salinities of 1.7 dS m-1 (S1) and 10.2 dS m-1 (S5).

 


View larger version (25K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 6. The periodic and cumulative simulated relative ET for the 3.5-d irrigation interval and irrigation water salinities of 1.7 dS m-1 (S1) and 10.2 dS m-1 (S5).

 


View larger version (26K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 7. The periodic and cumulative simulated relative ET for the 14-d irrigation interval and irrigation water salinity of 1.7 dS m-1 (S1) and 10.2 dS m-1 (S5).

 





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Crop Science
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Vadose Zone Journal
Journal of Plant Registrations Journal of
Environmental Quality
The Plant Genome
Copyright © 2003 by the Soil Science Society of America.