SSSAJ
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text Free
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow An erratum has been published
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (11)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Goldberg, S.
Right arrow Articles by Suarez, D. L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Goldberg, S.
Right arrow Articles by Suarez, D. L.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Goldberg, S.
Right arrow Articles by Suarez, D. L.
Related Collections
Right arrow Soil Methods/Instrumentation
Right arrow Soil Models
Right arrow Soil Chemistry

Predicting Molybdenum Adsorption by Soils Using Soil Chemical Parameters in the Constant Capacitance Model

Sabine Goldberg*, Scott M. Lesch and Donald L. Suarez

USDA-ARS, George E. Brown Jr. Salinity Lab., 450 W. Big Springs Road, Riverside, CA 92507



View larger version (25K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1. Constant capacitance modeling of Mo adsorption on Wyo soil: (a) monodentate fit, SOS/DF = 108; (b) bidentate fit, SOS/DF = 104; (c) monodentate prediction; (d) bidentate prediction. Circles represent experimental data. Model fits are represented by solid lines.

 


View larger version (26K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2. Constant capacitance modeling of Mo adsorption on Hesperia soil: (a) monodentate fit, SOS/DF = 183; (b) bidentate fit, SOS/DF = 174; (c) monodentate prediction; (d) bidentate prediction. Circles represent experimental data. Model fits are represented by solid lines.

 


View larger version (26K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 3. Constant capacitance modeling of Mo adsorption on Fallbrook subsoil: (a) monodentate fit, SOS/DF = 235; (b) bidentate fit, SOS/DF = 214; (c) monodentate prediction; (d) bidentate prediction. Circles represent experimental data. Model fits are represented by solid lines.

 


View larger version (27K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 4. Constant capacitance modeling of Mo adsorption on Nohili soil: (a) monodentate fit, SOS/DF = 323; (b) bidentate fit, SOS/DF = 320; (c) monodentate prediction; (d) bidentate prediction. Circles represent experimental data. Model fits are represented by solid lines.

 


View larger version (26K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 5. Constant capacitance modeling of Mo adsorption on Norge soil: (a) monodentate fit, SOS/DF = 580; (b) bidentate fit, SOS/DF = 570; (c) monodentate prediction; (d) bidentate prediction. Circles represent experimental data. Model fits are represented by solid lines.

 





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Crop Science
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Vadose Zone Journal
Journal of Plant Registrations Journal of
Environmental Quality
The Plant Genome
Copyright © 2002 by the Soil Science Society of America.