HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Abstract Full Text Free Full Text (PDF) Free Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in Web of Science Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via Web of Science (9) Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Schoorl, J. M. Articles by Bouma, J. Search for Related Content PubMed Articles by Schoorl, J. M. Articles by Bouma, J. GeoRef GeoRef Citation Agricola Articles by Schoorl, J. M. Articles by Bouma, J. Related Collections Watershed and Landscape Processes Soil Erosion Water Content

Modeling Water and Soil Redistribution in a Dynamic Landscape Context

Laboratory of Soil Science and Geology, Department of Environmental Sciences, Wageningen University, P.O. Box 37, 6700 AA Wageningen, The Netherlands

View larger version (133K): [in a new window]   Fig. 1. Study area in the lower Guadalhorce River basin with (a) DEM of the area with contour line interval 50 m, (b) major soil units according to parent material: river terraces (RI), gneiss (GN), molasse (MO), marls (MA), limestone (LM), phylites (PL), and serpentinite (SP), and (c) initial soil depth map.

View larger version (140K): [in a new window]   Fig. 2. Water redistribution with (a) run-off patterns of annual rainfall excess under Scenario A, (b) changes in run-off between Scenario A and B using multiple flow direction routing (MF) instead of steepest descent flow routing (SD), (c) detailed area indicated in (a) with SD, (d) detailed area with MF and (e) changes in run-off between Scenario B and C.

View larger version (113K): [in a new window]   Fig. 3. Annual soil redistribution in the landscape for Scenario D showing: (a) erosion and (b) sedimentation.

View larger version (131K): [in a new window]   Fig. 4. Changes in soil erosion patterns, shown with 5% decreasing or increasing threshold for (a) Scenario A to B, (b) Scenario B to C, (c) Scenario C to D and (d) total change from Scenario A to D.

View larger version (77K): [in a new window]   Fig. 5. Changes in sedimentation patterns, shown with 5% decreasing or increasing threshold for (a) Scenario A to B, (b) Scenario B to C, (c) Scenario C to D and (d) total change from Scenario A to D.

View larger version (120K): [in a new window]   Fig. 6. Changes in available water storage capacity for Scenario D compared with Scenario A.