SSSAJ
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text Free
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Logsdon, S. D.
Right arrow Articles by Moorman, T. B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Logsdon, S. D.
Right arrow Articles by Moorman, T. B.
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Logsdon, S. D.
Right arrow Articles by Moorman, T. B.
Related Collections
Right arrow Vadose Zone Processes and Chemical Transport
Right arrow Soil Models
Right arrow Preferential Flow

Measured and Predicted Solute Leaching from Multiple Undisturbed Soil Columns

S. D. Logsdon*,a, K. E. Kellerb and T. B. Moormana

a NSTL, 2150 Pammel Dr., Ames, IA 50011-3120
b BASF, Ag. Prod. Center, 26 Davis Dr., P.O. Box 13528, Res. Triangle Park, NC 27709-3528



View larger version (77K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1. Diagram of column showing the horizontal measurement planes for hydraulic conductivity as a function of head, K(h). Each measurement plane was the top depth for an undisturbed sample taken for bulk density and Ks (saturated). The model was run with eight depths, two for each of the measured sections. Loose soil was taken for particle-size analysis.

 


View larger version (27K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2. Predicted drainage vs. measured drainage for the twelve treatment combinations. Each predicted point was the mean of three replicates, and each measured point was the mean of four replicates.

 


View larger version (30K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 3. Predicted tritium leached vs measured tritium leached for the twelve treatment combinations. Each predicted point was the mean of three replicates, and each measured point was the mean of four replicates.

 


View larger version (29K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 4. Predicted Br leached vs. measured bromide leached for the twelve treatment combinations. Each predicted point was the mean of three replicates, and each measured point was the mean of four replicates.

 


View larger version (55K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 5. Measured Br concentration as a function of outflow volume for each soil–tillage–intensity combination.

 


View larger version (51K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 6. Measured tritium reduced concentration as a function of outflow volume for each soil–tillage–intensity combination.

 


View larger version (34K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 7. Mean predicted Br concentration at specified volume outflows for the high and low first rain intensity treatments and RMSE for each soil–tillage combination. Outflow for each rain event was about 20%.

 


View larger version (33K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 8. Mean predicted Br concentration at specified volume outflows for the high and low first rain intensity treatments and RMSE for each soil–tillage combination. Outflow for each rain event was about 20%.

 





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Crop Science
Vadose Zone Journal Journal of Plant Registrations
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Journal of
Environmental Quality
Copyright © 2002 by the Soil Science Society of America.