SSSAJ
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text Free
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow An erratum has been published
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (34)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Minasny, B.
Right arrow Articles by McBratney, Alex. B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Minasny, B.
Right arrow Articles by McBratney, Alex. B.
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Minasny, B.
Right arrow Articles by McBratney, Alex. B.
Related Collections
Right arrow Soil Physics
Right arrow Statistics
Right arrow Hydraulic Conductivity

The Neuro-m Method for Fitting Neural Network Parametric Pedotransfer Functions

Budiman Minasny* and Alex. B. McBratney

Australian Cotton Cooperative Research Centre, Department of Agricultural Chemistry and Soil Science, Ross St. Building A03, The University of Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia



View larger version (26K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1. The scaled water content Se and scaled potential {alpha}h of the (a) measured data, and (b) predicted using extended nonlinear regression.

 


View larger version (37K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2. The structure of a neural network.

 


View larger version (25K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 3. Structure of a neural network predicting the van Genuchten parameters and water retention.

 


View larger version (13K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 4. Akaike's Information Criterion (AIC) as a function of the number of hidden units.

 


View larger version (38K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 5. Measured and predicted water content using Neuroman and Rosetta with four inputs for the Australian prediction, Australian validation, and independent GRIZZLY data sets.

 


View larger version (16K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 6. The mean residuals (MR) plotted against root mean squared residuals (RMSR) using Neuroman (Neu) and Rosetta (Ros) for the Australian prediction (P), Australian validation (V), and independent GRIZZLY (G) data sets.

 





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Crop Science
Vadose Zone Journal Journal of Plant Registrations
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Journal of
Environmental Quality
Copyright © 2002 by the Soil Science Society of America.