SSSAJ
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text Free
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (6)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Young, M. H.
Right arrow Articles by Pennell, K. D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Young, M. H.
Right arrow Articles by Pennell, K. D.
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Young, M. H.
Right arrow Articles by Pennell, K. D.
Related Collections
Right arrow Flow
Right arrow Soil Physics
Right arrow Hydraulic Conductivity

A modified upward infiltration method for characterizing soil hydraulic properties

M. H. Young*,a, A. Karagunduzb, J. Simunekc and K. D. Pennellb

a Division of Hydrologic Sciences, Desert Research Institute, Las Vegas, NV 89119
b School of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA 30332
c U.S. Salinity Laboratory, USDA–ARS, Riverside, CA 92507



View larger version (22K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1. Schematic of experimental setup.

 


View larger version (36K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2. Observed pressure head (A) and cumulative flux (B) for uniformily-packed Vinton (Rep 1) and Appling (Rep 2) soils. Observed (symbols) and predicted (line) pressure head (C and D) and cumulative fluxes (E and F) are shown for same replicates for Vinton and Appling soils, respectively. Predicted line may be hidden by symbols. Note different scales for abscissa for A and B.

 


View larger version (25K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 3. Fitted (symbols) and global (line) soil water retention (A and C) and hydraulic conductivity functions (B and D) for Vinton and Appling soils, respectively. Squares, diamonds, and triangles correspond to Replicates 1 to 3, respectively.

 


View larger version (38K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 4. Observed pressure head (A) and cumulative flux (B) for Appling/Vinton (Rep 3) and Vinton/Appling (Rep 1). Observed (symbols) and predicted (line) pressure head (C and D) and cumulative fluxes (E and F) are shown for same replicates.

 





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Crop Science
Vadose Zone Journal Journal of Plant Registrations
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Journal of
Environmental Quality
Copyright © 2002 by the Soil Science Society of America.