SSSAJ
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text Free
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Thompson, T. L.
Right arrow Articles by Godin, R. E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Thompson, T. L.
Right arrow Articles by Godin, R. E.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Thompson, T. L.
Right arrow Articles by Godin, R. E.
Related Collections
Right arrow Nutrient Management
Right arrow Vadose Zone Processes and Chemical Transport
Right arrow Irrigation

Subsurface Drip Irrigation and Fertigation of Broccoli

II. Agronomic, Economic, and Environmental Outcomes

Thomas L. Thompson*,a, Thomas A. Doergeb and Ronald E. Godinc

a Dep. of Soil, Water, and Environmental Science, University of Arizona, 429 Shantz Bldg. #38, Tucson, AZ 85721
b Pioneer Hi-Bred International, Inc., P.O. Box 1150, Johnston, IA 50131
c Colorado State University, Rogers Mesa Research Center, 3060 Highway 92, Hotchkiss, CO 81419



View larger version (44K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1. Response surfaces for broccoli grown during the 1993–1994 season: (a) predicted marketable yield (Mg ha-1), (b) predicted net return ($ ha-1), (c) predicted unaccounted fertilizer N (kg ha-1), (d) Spatial analysis of response surfaces of marketable yield, net return, and unaccounted fertilizer N. Arrows denote the point of maximum response on the surface. The shaded area in (d) represents overlap of the zones of >=95% of the maximum predicted marketable yield and net return, and <=40 kg ha-1 of unaccounted fertilizer N.

 


View larger version (52K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 3. Response surfaces for broccoli grown during the 1995 to 1996 season: (a) predicted marketable yield (Mg ha-1), (b) predicted net return ($ ha-1), (c) predicted unaccounted fertilizer N (kg ha-1), (d) Spatial analysis of response surfaces of marketable yield, net return, and unaccounted fertilizer N. Arrows denote the point of maximum response on the surface. The shaded area in (d) represents overlap of the zones of >=95% of the maximum predicted marketable yield and net return, and <=40 kg ha-1 of unaccounted fertilizer N.

 


View larger version (44K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2. Response surfaces for broccoli grown during the 1994–1995 season: (a) predicted marketable yield (Mg ha-1), (b) predicted net return ($ ha-1), (c) predicted unaccounted fertilizer N (kg ha-1), (d) Spatial analysis of response surfaces of marketable yield, net return, and unaccounted fertilizer N. Arrows denote the point of maximum response on the surface. The shaded area in (d) represents overlap of the zones of >=95% of the maximum predicted marketable yield and net return, and <=40 kg ha-1 of unaccounted fertilizer N.

 


View larger version (38K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 4. Postharvest soil NO3 concentrations for broccoli during the 1993 to 1996 growing seasons. Bars represent Fisher's least significant difference (P = 0.05).

 





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Crop Science
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Vadose Zone Journal
Journal of Plant Registrations Journal of
Environmental Quality
The Plant Genome
Copyright © 2002 by the Soil Science Society of America.