SSSAJ
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text Free
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (6)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Chen, M.
Right arrow Articles by Ma, L. Q.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Chen, M.
Right arrow Articles by Ma, L. Q.
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Chen, M.
Right arrow Articles by Ma, L. Q.
Related Collections
Right arrow Other Environmental Contamination
Right arrow Nutrient Management
Right arrow Soil Classification and Mapping

Taxonomic and Geographic Distribution of Total Phosphorus in Florida Surface Soils

Ming Chen*,a and Lena Q. Mab

a Institute of Geography and Natural Resources, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100101, China
b Soil and Water Science Dept., University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32611-0290



View larger version (75K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1. Distributions of Florida soil orders based on the state soil geographic database at a scale of 1:250000 and selected Florida cooperative soil survey program soil sampling sites. White areas are water bodies. Numerous neighboring sampling sites appear coincident at this map scale. White areas are water bodies.

 


View larger version (30K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2. Cumulative probability curves for total P in 448 Florida surface soils based on soil orders. Dashed lines represent upper baseline concentrations (UBC). Numbers in parenthesis are sample number for each soil order.

 


View larger version (18K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 3. Cumulative probability curves for total P in Florida surface soils: disturbed vs. undisturbed soils. Numbers in parenthesis are sample number for each soil category.

 


View larger version (73K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 4. Map of estimates of total soil P for Florida soil suborders based on the state soil geographic database at a scale of 1:250000 and geographic distribution of potential P elevated sites for disturbed and undisturbed soils. White areas are water bodies.

 


View larger version (55K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 5. Maps of Florida showing factors influencing total P contents in surface soils. (a) Total Fe. (b) Total Al. (c) Phosphate deposits. (d) Commercial phosphate fertilizer application rates.

 





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Crop Science
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Vadose Zone Journal
Journal of Plant Registrations Journal of
Environmental Quality
The Plant Genome
Copyright © 2001 by the Soil Science Society of America.