SSSAJ
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text Free
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (26)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Shani, U.
Right arrow Articles by Dudley, L. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Shani, U.
Right arrow Articles by Dudley, L. M.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Shani, U.
Right arrow Articles by Dudley, L. M.
Related Collections
Right arrow Other Crop Management
Right arrow Water Stress
Right arrow Irrigation

Field Studies of Crop Response to Water and Salt Stress

U. Shani*,a and L. M. Dudleyb

a Department of Soil and Water Sciences, Faculty of Agricultural, Food and Environmental Sciences, POB 12, Rehovot 76100, Israel
b Department of Plants, Soils, and Biometeorology, Utah State University, Logan, UT 84322-4820



View larger version (20K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1. The relative dry matter yield of melon as affected by irrigation and salinity treatments (a) with piecewise linear models fit to the irrigation response data for each salinity treatment and (b) with piecewise linear models fit to the irrigation response data for the lowest salinity treatment and irrigation response data for each salinity treatment above the critical irrigation level (the intercept of the two line segments).

 


View larger version (21K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2. The relative dry matter yield of corn as affected by irrigation and salinity treatments (a) with piecewise linear models fit to the irrigation response data for each salinity treatment and (b) with piecewise linear models fit to the irrigation response data for the lowest salinity treatment and irrigation response data for each salinity treatment above the critical irrigation level (the intercept of the two line segments).

 


View larger version (14K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 3. The relative dry matter yield of alfalfa as affected by irrigation and salinity treatments with piecewise linear models fit to the irrigation response data for the lowest salinity treatment below the critical irrigation level and irrigation response data for each salinity treatment above the critical irrigation level.

 


View larger version (15K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 4. The relative fruit yield of melon as affected by irrigation and salinity treatments with piecewise linear models fit to the irrigation response data for the lowest salinity treatment below the critical irrigation level and irrigation response data for each salinity treatment above the critical irrigation level.

 


View larger version (24K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 5. The relative dry matter yield of corn and melon as a function of relative transpiration for each salinity treatment. The dashed line represents the 95% confidence limits for the regression Y Y-1max = 0.134 + 0.805; r2 = 0.8833.

 





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Crop Science
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Vadose Zone Journal
Journal of Plant Registrations Journal of
Environmental Quality
The Plant Genome
Copyright © 2001 by the Soil Science Society of America.