SSSAJ
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text Free
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (6)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Yermiyahu, U.
Right arrow Articles by Chen, Y.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Yermiyahu, U.
Right arrow Articles by Chen, Y.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Yermiyahu, U.
Right arrow Articles by Chen, Y.
Related Collections
Right arrow Soil Kinetics
Right arrow Plant Nutrition

Effect of Composted Organic Matter on Boron Uptake by Plants

U. Yermiyahu*,a, R. Kerenb and Y. Chenc

a Gilat Experimental Station, Agricultural Research Organization Mobile Post Negev, Israel
b Institute of Soil, Water and Environmental Sciences, Agricultural Research Organization, The Volcani Center, Bet Dagan, Israel
c The Seagram Center for Soil and Water Sciences, Faculty of Agricultural, Food and Environmental Quality Sciences, P.O. Box 12, The Hebrew Univ. of Jerusalem, Rehovot 76100, Israel



View larger version (31K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1. Adjusted B concentration in soil solution at a water content of 30% (w/w) after 2 d of equilibration (A) and after harvest of the plants (B) vs. the COM content of the soil–sand–COM mixture at four levels of B application (B concentration was measured in the saturated paste extract and adjusted to a water content of 30% using Eq. [2]).

 


View larger version (20K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2. A comparison between adjusted B concentration in the soil solution (adjusted to a water content of 30%) after 2 d of equilibration and B concentration calculated using Eq. [1], [2], and [3] and the adsorption coefficients given in Table 1. The calculation was performed for the same pH, solution-to-soil ratio, and total added B as in the plant growth experiment.

 


View larger version (23K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 3. Boron concentration in pepper leaves vs. COM content in the soil–sand–COM mixture at four levels of B application.

 


View larger version (21K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 4. Boron concentration in pepper leaves vs. B concentration in the soil solution adjusted for a water content of 30%, after 2 d of equilibration, and B concentration evaluated using Eq. [1], [2], and [3] and adsorption coefficients given in Table 2. The calculation was performed for the same pH, solution to soil ratio, and total B as in the plant growth experiment (the line is based on the evaluated values).

 





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Crop Science
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Vadose Zone Journal
Journal of Plant Registrations Journal of
Environmental Quality
The Plant Genome
Copyright © 2001 by the Soil Science Society of America.