SSSAJ
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text Free
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (30)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Vrugt, J. A.
Right arrow Articles by Simunek, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Vrugt, J. A.
Right arrow Articles by Simunek, J.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Vrugt, J. A.
Right arrow Articles by Simunek, J.
Related Collections
Right arrow Other Grain Crops
Right arrow Soil Models
Right arrow Soil Physics

Calibration of a Two-Dimensional Root Water Uptake Model

J. A. Vrugta, J. W. Hopmans*,b and J. Simunekc

a Institute for Biodiversity and Ecosystem Dynamics, University of Amsterdam, The Netherlands, Nieuwe Prinsengracht 130, Amsterdam, 1018 VZ
b Hydrology Program, Dept. Land, Air and Water Resources (LAWR), University of California, Davis, CA 95616, USA
c USDA Salinity Laboratory, University of California, Riverside, CA 95207, USA



View larger version (16K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1. Representation of different root water uptake models, Sm(z), with depth.

 


View larger version (58K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2. Four different configurations of two-dimensional spatial distribution of potential root water uptake, ß(r,z).

 


View larger version (32K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 3. Schematic view of the experimental plot (after Koumanov et al., 1997).

 


View larger version (17K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 4. Soil surface boundary conditions during simulation period (Time 0 corresponds with 13 September).

 


View larger version (20K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 5. Optimized soil water retention and unsaturated hydraulic conductivity curves as obtained by the Simplex Algorithm optimization and measured ({theta},h) using the multistep outflow method from soil cores taken at 30-cm depth at a nearby location and (K,{theta}) points, as obtained using the instantaneous profile method at a nearby location for the 30-cm soil depth.

 


View larger version (43K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 6. Optimized spatial distribution of potential transpiration ß(r,z).

 


View larger version (31K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 7. Measured (open circles) and simulated (solid lines) water content values as a function of time across the measured spatial domain of the almond tree (C denotes calibration and V is validation).

 


View larger version (53K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 8. Two-dimensional maps of simulated water content values (m3 m-3) and root water uptake (d-1) at three different times during the experimental period.

 


View larger version (13K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 9. (a) Components of the water balance, (b) Measured versus simulated soil water storage during the monitoring period.

 





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Crop Science
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Vadose Zone Journal
Journal of Plant Registrations Journal of
Environmental Quality
The Plant Genome
Copyright © 2001 by the Soil Science Society of America.