SSSAJ
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text Free
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (12)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kolka, R.K.
Right arrow Articles by Verry, E.S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Kolka, R.K.
Right arrow Articles by Verry, E.S.
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Kolka, R.K.
Right arrow Articles by Verry, E.S.
Related Collections
Right arrow Watershed and Landscape Processes
Right arrow Forest Soils

Hydrologic Cycling of Mercury and Organic Carbon in a Forested Upland–Bog Watershed

R.K. Kolkaa, D.F. Grigalb, E.A. Naterb and E.S. Verryc

a Dep. of Forestry, Univ. of Kentucky, Lexington, KY 40546
b Dep. of Soil, Water, and Climate, Univ. of Minnesota, St. Paul, MN 55108
c USDA Forest Service, N.C. Forest Experiment Station, Grand Rapids, MN 55744



View larger version (21K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1. Mass balance model of the hydrological components of an upland–peatland watershed

 


View larger version (32K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2. Schematic of the S2 watershed at the Marcell Experimental Forest

 


View larger version (20K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 3. Throughfall and stemflow flux of total Hg (HgT) and dissolved organic C (DOC) in the S2 watershed and precipitation in a nearby opening in 1995. Watershed is an areal weighted average. Error bars are standard errors

 


View larger version (16K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 4. Monthly flow volumes for the S2 watershed in 1995

 


View larger version (22K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 5. Mean monthly concentrations of total Hg (HgT) and organic C (OC) in (a) upland surface runoff, (b) interflow, (c) bog runoff, and (d) streamflow for the S2 watershed in 1995. TOC, total organic C; DOC, dissolved organic C; POC, particulate organic C; HgT, total Hg

 


View larger version (28K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 6. Monthly fluxes of total Hg (HgT) and organic C (OC) in (a) upland surface runoff, (b) upland interflow, and (c) bog runoff for the S2 watershed in 1995. Mean annual concentrations of HgT and OC were applied to bog flows in March, April, November, and December to estimate fluxes for those months

 


View larger version (28K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 7. Relationships between mean monthly total Hg (HgT) and particulate organic C (POC) concentration in (a) upland surface runoff, (b) upland interflow, (c) bog flow, and (d) streamflow for the S2 watershed

 


View larger version (22K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 8. Monthly comparison of total Hg (HgT), dissolved organic C (DOC), and particulate organic C (POC) influxes to the (a) lagg and those fluxes in (b) streamflow

 





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Crop Science
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Vadose Zone Journal
Journal of Plant Registrations Journal of
Environmental Quality
The Plant Genome
Copyright © 2001 by the Soil Science Society of America.