HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Abstract Full Text Free Full Text (PDF) Free Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in ISI Web of Science Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (5) Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Sirjacobs, D. Articles by Levy, G.J. Search for Related Content PubMed Articles by Sirjacobs, D. Articles by Levy, G.J. GeoRef GeoRef Citation Agricola Articles by Sirjacobs, D. Articles by Levy, G.J. Related Collections Flow Soil Erosion Other Soil Management

Flow Interruption Effects on Intake Rate and Rill Erosion in Two Soils

Institute of Soil, Water and Environmental Sciences, Agricultural Research Organization (ARO), The Volcani Center, P.O. Box 6, Bet Dagan 50250, Israel

View larger version (33K): [in a new window]   Fig. 1. Intake rate as a function of cumulative flow time for the clay soil and silt loam at Stage 1 (a) and Stage 2 (b) of the experiment. For a given cumulative flow time, and within a soil, bars labeled by the same letter (lower case for the clay soil and upper case for the silt loam) do not differ significantly at the 0.05 level

View larger version (17K): [in a new window]   Fig. 2. Intake rate as a function of cumulative intake for the silt loam and clay soil. The "/" on each curve indicates transition from Stage 1 to Stage 2 of the experiment

View larger version (31K): [in a new window]   Fig. 3. Erosion rate as a function of cumulative flow time for the clay soil and silt loam at Stage 1 (a) and Stage 2 (b) of the experiment. For a given cumulative flow time, and within a soil, bars labeled by the same letter (lower case for the clay soil and upper case for the loess) do not differ significantly at the 0.05 level