SSSAJ
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text Free
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (10)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Mace, J.E.
Right arrow Articles by Amrhein, C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Mace, J.E.
Right arrow Articles by Amrhein, C.
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Mace, J.E.
Right arrow Articles by Amrhein, C.

Leaching and Reclamation of a Soil Irrigated with Moderate SAR Waters

J.E. Mace and C. Amrhein

Dep. of Environmental Sciences, Graduate Program in Soil and Water Sciences, Univ. of California, Riverside, CA



View larger version (27K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1. Hydraulic conductivity as a function of SAR and electrolyte concentration. Statistically significant differences (P < 0.05) indicated by different letters

 


View larger version (25K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2. Dispersed clay in the leachates from the columns as a function of SAR and electrolyte concentration. Statistically significant differences (P < 0.05) indicated by different letters

 


View larger version (31K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 3. Swelling as a function of SAR and electrolyte concentration. Statistically significant differences (P < 0.05) indicated by different letters

 


View larger version (27K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 4. Hydraulic conductivity of the soil following a surface application of gypsum (5 Mg ha-1 equivalent) and leached with deionized water

 


View larger version (39K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 5. Internal swelling of the soil following surface application of gypsum or H2SO4 and leached with deionized water. Internal swelling was measured by the amount of water held by the soil at -22 kPa relative to the amount of 100 mmolc L-1 solution held at the same tension

 


View larger version (27K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 6. Hydraulic conductivity of the soil following surface application of H2SO4 (3 Mg ha-1 equivalent) and leached with deionized water. The decrease in hydraulic conductivity immediately following acid application is attributed to a surface skin and trapped gas in the top of the soil

 





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Crop Science
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Vadose Zone Journal
Journal of Plant Registrations Journal of
Environmental Quality
The Plant Genome
Copyright © 2001 by the Soil Science Society of America.