SSSAJ
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text Free
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (1)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Otten, W.
Right arrow Articles by Longstaff, D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Otten, W.
Right arrow Articles by Longstaff, D.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Otten, W.
Right arrow Articles by Longstaff, D.

Method to Quantify Short-Term Dynamics in Carbon Dioxide Emission Following Controlled Soil Deformation

Wilfred Ottena,b, Chris W. Wattsb and Dave Longstaffb

a Dep. of Plant Sciences, Univ. of Cambridge, Downing Street, Cambridge CB2 3EA, UK
b Silsoe Research Institute, Soil Science Group, Wrest Park, Silsoe, Bedford MK 45 4 HS, UK



View larger version (39K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1 The respirometer comprising a chamber in which a soil sample is contained (a) , an electro-conductive cell (b), and a pump to circulate air through the cell and chamber (c). The respirometer chamber can be placed in standard direct shear equipment to apply controlled mechanical disturbances of soil structure with simultaneous monitoring of the CO2 emission

 


View larger version (22K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2 The ratio between volume strain and stress for a sample of repacked sieved aggregates. The dots along the continuous line are measured data for replicated samples with successive increase in normal load up to 430 kPa, followed by a successive decrease. The arrows indicate the pathways followed. The numbers (1–6) along the line are the treatments (for normal load) that were selected to asses the effect upon biological activity. The dashed line represents the critical state line that separates conditions that lead to consolidation from those that lead to volume expansion upon shearing (see text for further details). Letters (A–D) in the graph refer to four conditions that were selected to asses the effect of shearing upon biological activity, as defined in the text and summarized in Table 1

 


View larger version (14K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 3 The relationship between volume strain (change in volume/original volume) and stress ratio (normal load during shearing/maximum normal load experienced by the sample before shearing). The stress ratio at which the sample behavior switched from expansion to consolidation upon shearing is indicated by the dotted line and determines the location of the critical state line in Fig. 2

 


View larger version (28K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 4 Dynamics in CO2 emission rate before and after controlled shear and compressive soil deformations . All treatments resulted in enhanced CO2 emission of the soil upon deformation (see Table 1). The time refers to the hours before (negative values) or following (positive values) the soil deformations performed within the respirometer. (a) Compression alone with normal loads of 430 kPa, or (b) 79 kPa (6 and 4, respectively, in Fig. 2). Combined shear and compressive stresses of samples with different (precompression) stress histories: (c) samples precompressed with 430 kPa were sheared with the same load during shearing (Stress ratio 1, Point B in Fig. 2) or (d) reduced load (Stress ratio 0.05, Point D in Fig. 2); (e) samples precompressed with 79 kPa were sheared with the same load during shearing (Stress ratio 1, Point A in Fig. 2) or (f) reduced load (Stress ratio 0.05, Point C in Fig. 2). (g) The effect of the mechanical disturbance as summarized in Table 1 was assessed relative to untreated soil samples

 


View larger version (14K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 5 The relationship between the volume strain and the relative CO2 emission rate (rate for compressed sample/rate for uncompressed sample) measured 1 wk after compression of a sample of repacked sieved aggregates equilibrated at -5.5 kPa

 





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Crop Science
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Vadose Zone Journal
Journal of Plant Registrations Journal of
Environmental Quality
The Plant Genome
Copyright © 2000 by the Soil Science Society of America.