HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Abstract Full Text Free Full Text (PDF) Free Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in Web of Science Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Web of Science (27) Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by White, J.R. Articles by Reddy, K.R. Search for Related Content PubMed Articles by White, J.R. Articles by Reddy, K.R. GeoRef GeoRef Citation Agricola Articles by White, J.R. Articles by Reddy, K.R.

Influence of Phosphorus Loading on Organic Nitrogen Mineralization of Everglades Soils

Wetland Biogeochemistry Lab., Soil and Water Science Dep., 106 Newell Hall, Univ. of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32611 USA

View larger version (18K): [in a new window]   Fig. 1 Station locations along soil phosphorous gradient in WCA-2A (south of S-10C water control structure) used in the study

View larger version (25K): [in a new window]   Fig. 2 Microbial biomass carbon (MBC) and nitrogen (MBN) vs distance from inflow for detritus, 0- to 10-cm and 10- to 30-cm soil intervals along transect in WCA-2A. Plotted are mean values and one standard error for February 1996, August 1996, and March 1997 sampling dates

View larger version (18K): [in a new window]   Fig. 3 Potentially mineralizable N for detritus, 0- to 10-cm and 10- to 30-cm soil interval from along the study transect in WCA-2A for the February and August 1996 and March 1997 samplings. Plotted are means with one standard error

View larger version (17K): [in a new window]   Fig. 4 Potentially mineralizable N rate vs total phosphorus for mesocosm and transect samples combined

View larger version (17K): [in a new window]   Fig. 5 Potentially mineralizable N rate vs extractable NH+4 for mesocosm and transect samples combined

View larger version (24K): [in a new window]   Fig. 6 Potentially mineralizable N rate vs microbial biomass C and N for mesocosm and transect samples combined

View larger version (15K): [in a new window]   Fig. 7 Substrate induced N mineralization rates for detritus and soil samples under drained and flooded conditions measured in the field from along the transect in WCA-2A