HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Abstract Full Text Free Full Text (PDF) Free Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in Web of Science Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Web of Science (51) Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Johnson, D.W. Articles by Burke, I.C. Search for Related Content PubMed Articles by Johnson, D.W. Articles by Burke, I.C. GeoRef GeoRef Citation Agricola Articles by Johnson, D.W. Articles by Burke, I.C.

Biotic and Abiotic Nitrogen Retention in a Variety of Forest Soils

^a Desert Research Institute, 2215 Raggio Parkway, and Environmental and Resource Sciences, Univ. of Nevada, Reno, NV 89512 USA
^b Dep. of Environmental Studies, Univ. of California, Santa Cruz, CA 95064 USA
^c Dep. of Forest Sciences and Natural Resource Ecology Lab., Colorado State Univ., Fort Collins, CO 80523 USA

View larger version (28K): [in a new window]   Fig. 1 Carbon dioxide concentration in the headspace of incubated soils with and without HgCl2

View larger version (26K): [in a new window]   Fig. 2 Nitrogen concentration in samples from the study sites (see Table 1 for code). (Note that Oa horizons were either not present or too thin to be sampled at the ULVC and SB sites.)

View larger version (28K): [in a new window]   Fig. 3 C:N ratio in samples from the study sites (see Table 1 for code)

View larger version (25K): [in a new window]   Fig. 4 Oa and A horizon pH and A horizon base saturation for samples taken from the study sites (see Table 1 for code)

View larger version (24K): [in a new window]   Fig. 5 15N natural abundance in samples from the study sites. (see Table 1 for code.)

View larger version (29K): [in a new window]   Fig. 6 Biotic N immobilization samples from the study sites (see Table 1 for code). In the A horizons, values are plotted on the basis of soil weight (100 x mg N kg soil-1) and on the basis of organic matter weight in soil (mg N kg OM-1). Values on the soil weight basis are multiplied by 100 for scale

View larger version (27K): [in a new window]   Fig. 7 Plots of biotic and Abiotic N immobilization against N concentration. Correlation coefficients (r2) are shown for power function regressions of the form y = a(xb) of biotic N immobilization and N concentration in the O horizons

View larger version (32K): [in a new window]   Fig. 8 Abiotic N immobilization samples from the study sites (see Table 1 for code). In the A horizons, values are plotted on the basis of soil weight (100 x mg N kg soil-1) and on the basis of organic matter weight in soil (mg N kg OM-1). Values on the soil weight basis are multiplied by for scale

View larger version (59K): [in a new window]   Fig. 9 Percentage abiotic and biotic N immobilization in O and A horizons from the study sites (see Table 1 for code)