SSSAJ
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text Free
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (14)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Young, F.J.
Right arrow Articles by Hammer, R.D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Young, F.J.
Right arrow Articles by Hammer, R.D.
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Young, F.J.
Right arrow Articles by Hammer, R.D.

Defining Geographic Soil Bodies by Landscape Position, Soil Taxonomy, and Cluster Analysis

F.J. Younga and R.D. Hammerb

a GIS Lab, 306 Founders Hall, Lincoln Univ., 820 Chestnut St., Jefferson City, MO 65102 USA
b Soil Genesis, School of Natural Resources, Univ. of Missouri-Columbia, 302 ABNR Building, Columbia, MO 65211 USA



View larger version (27K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1 Identified landforms within the study area, and locations of sampled pedons along transects, identified by cluster group

 


View larger version (30K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2 Profiles of group means from three-group cluster analysis, in units of standard deviations from the overall means: a) variables representing lessivage and leaching, b) variables representing melanization, color development and parent material. See Table 1 for variable definitions, and Table 2 for pedogenic process definitions and relationships to variables

 


View larger version (38K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 3 Pedons observed for each cluster group (1, 2, and 3) on ridge and backslope landforms, compared with the number of pedons expected if there were no relationship between cluster groups and landforms

 


View larger version (73K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 4 Pedons observed for each cluster group (1, 2, and 3) on each surface shape (convex, plane and concave) within the backslope, compared with the number of pedons expected if there were no relationship between cluster groups and surface shape in profile

 


View larger version (30K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 5 Locations of pedons sampled by taxonomic classification, in relationship to landforms. Classes with fewer than 3 pedons are not shown. Codes are given in Table 3

 


View larger version (20K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 6 Pedons observed for each cluster group in each taxonomic class, compared with the number of pedons expected if there were no relationship between cluster groups and taxonomic classes. Codes for taxonomic classes are given in Table 3

 





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Crop Science
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Vadose Zone Journal
Journal of Plant Registrations Journal of
Environmental Quality
The Plant Genome
Copyright © 2000 by the Soil Science Society of America.