SSSAJ
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text Free
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (41)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Qualls, R.G.
Right arrow Articles by Tyler, S.W.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Qualls, R.G.
Right arrow Articles by Tyler, S.W.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Qualls, R.G.
Right arrow Articles by Tyler, S.W.

Soluble Organic and Inorganic Nutrient Fluxes in Clearcut and Mature Deciduous Forests

R.G. Quallsa, B.L. Hainesb, W.T. Swankc and S.W. Tylera

a Dep. of Environmental and Resource Sci., Univ. of Nevada, M.S. 370, Reno, NV 89557 USA
b Botany Dep., Univ. of Georgia, Athens, GA, 30602 USA
c USDA Forest Service, Coweeta Hydrologic Lab., Otto, NC, 29763 USA




View larger version (48K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1 Flux weighted average concentrations (a and b) and fluxes (c and d) of dissolved organic C (DOC) for the uncut and cut plots. Strata or soil horizons are indicated on the vertical axis. Asterisks indicate significant (P < 0.05) differences (a significant main effect of cutting treatment in the ANOVA) between cut vs. uncut plots and are placed on bar the which was greater. Error bars are standard error of the mean, indicated only for the organic form and reflect variability among plots, not temporal variability. Numbers beside the bars indicate values

 



View larger version (55K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2 Flux weighted average concentrations (a and b) and fluxes (c and d) of N forms for the uncut and cut plots. Asterisks indicate significant (P < 0.05) differences (a significant main effect of cutting treatment in the ANOVA) in dissolved organic N (DON) (not inorganic forms) between cut vs. uncut plots, and are placed on bar which was greater. Error bars are standard error of the mean, indicated only for the organic form and reflect variability among plots, not temporal variability. Numbers on or beside the bars indicate values and are in the same order as stacking of the bars

 



View larger version (44K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 3 Flux weighted average concentrations (a and b) and fluxes (c and d) of P forms for the uncut and cut plots. Asterisks indicate significant (P < 0.05) differences (a significant main effect of cutting treatment in the ANOVA) in dissolved organic P (DOP) (not PO4) between cut vs. uncut plots , and are placed on bar which was greater. Error bars are standard error of the mean, indicated only for the organic form and reflect variability among plots, not temporal variability. Numbers on or beside the bars indicate values and are in the same order as stacking of the bars

 





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Crop Science
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Vadose Zone Journal
Journal of Plant Registrations Journal of
Environmental Quality
The Plant Genome
Copyright © 2000 by the Soil Science Society of America.