SSSAJ
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text Free
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (51)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Franzluebbers, A.J.
Right arrow Articles by Hons, F.M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Franzluebbers, A.J.
Right arrow Articles by Hons, F.M.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Franzluebbers, A.J.
Right arrow Articles by Hons, F.M.

Flush of Carbon Dioxide Following Rewetting of Dried Soil Relates to Active Organic Pools

A.J. Franzluebbersa, R.L. Haneyb, C.W. Honeycuttc, H.H. Schomberga and F.M. Honsb

a USDA–ARS, J. Phil Campbell Sr. Nat. Resour. Conserv. Cent., 1420 Experiment Station Rd., Watkinsville, GA 30677 USA
b Dep. of Soil and Crop Sci., Texas A&M Univ. and Texas Agricultural Experiment Stn., College Station, TX 77843 USA
c USDA–ARS, New England Plant, Soil, and Water Lab., Orono, ME 04469 USA



View larger version (39K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1 Typical responses of cumulative C mineralization and rate of C mineralization following rewetting of dried soil in soils with various quantities of available C (VL is very low, L is low, M is medium, H is high, and VH is very high). Basal-soil respiration is achieved at {approx}10 d. Dashed lines indicate the C mineralized due to fumigation at 10 d. The inset magnifies the rate of C mineralization with time

 


View larger version (21K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2 Relationship of C mineralization during 0–3 d with C mineralization during 0–1 d in four soils from Texas

 


View larger version (35K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 3 Relationships of C mineralization during 0–3 d with C mineralization during 0–24 d in soils from Alberta–British Columbia, Maine, Texas, and Georgia. Lower panels are magnifications of the 0 to 500 mg kg-1 range in CMIN0-3d for each of the four regions

 


View larger version (38K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 4 Relationships of C mineralization during 0–3 d with soil microbial biomass C in soils from Alberta–British Columbia, Maine, Texas, and Georgia. Lower panels are magnifications of the 0 to 500 mg kg-1 range in CMIN0-3d for each of the four regions. Dashed lines in the Alberta–British Columbia subpanel indicate regression lines of whole soil (upper line, r2 = 0.87) and aggregate fractions (lower line, r2 = 0.85)

 


View larger version (38K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 5 Relationships of C mineralization during 0–3 d with net N mineralization during 0–24 d in soils from Alberta–British Columbia, Maine, Texas, and Georgia. Lower panels are magnifications of the 0 to 500 mg kg-1 range in CMIN0-3d for each of the four regions

 


View larger version (36K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 6 Relationships of C mineralization during 0–3 d with particulate and total organic C in soils from Alberta–British Columbia, Maine, Texas, and Georgia

 





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Crop Science
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Vadose Zone Journal
Journal of Plant Registrations Journal of
Environmental Quality
The Plant Genome
Copyright © 2000 by the Soil Science Society of America.