SSSAJ
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text Free
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (4)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Chappell, H.N.
Right arrow Articles by Vesterdal, L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Chappell, H.N.
Right arrow Articles by Vesterdal, L.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Chappell, H.N.
Right arrow Articles by Vesterdal, L.

Long-Term Effects of Nitrogen Fertilization on Nitrogen Availability in Coastal Douglas-Fir Forest Floors

H.N. Chappell{dagger},a, C.E. Prescottb and L. Vesterdalc

a College of Forest Resources, Univ. of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195 USA
b Faculty of Forestry, Univ. of British Columbia, 2424 Main Mall, Vancouver, BC V6T 1Z4, Canada
c Dep. of Forest Ecology, Danish Forest and Landscape Research Institute, Hørsholm Kongevej 11, DK-2970 Hørsholm, Denmark



View larger version (25K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1 Aboveground litterfall C and N in control (closed circles, solid regression line) and fertilized stands (open circles, dashed regression line) along the gradient in soil N capital: (a) C contents, (b) N contents, and (c) C/N ratios. In (a) the values for the fertilized plots at the two sites with highest N capital are the same as those for the control plots

 


View larger version (16K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2 Forest floor C and N in control (closed circles, solid regression line) and fertilized stands (open circles, dashed regression line) along the gradient in soil N capital: (a) N contents and (b) C/N ratios. Note the logarithmic y-axis

 


View larger version (17K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 3 Fractional annual losses of C and N (annual input of senesced needle litter/forest floor mass) in forest floors of control (closed circles, solid regression line) and fertilized stands (open circles, dashed regression line) along the gradient in soil N capital: (a) C loss and (b) N loss. In (a) the value for the fertilized plots at the site with the lowest N capital is the same as that for the control plot

 


View larger version (18K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 4 Net nitrogen mineralization rates in forest floors from control (closed circles, solid regression line) and fertilized stands (open circles, dashed regression line) along the gradient in soil N capital during a 24-d laboratory incubation in control and fertilized plots. Note the logarithmic y-axis

 


View larger version (14K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 5 Net nitrification rates in forest floors from control (closed circles, solid regression line) and fertilized stands (open circles, dashed regression line) along the gradient in soil N capital during a 24-d laboratory incubation. Bars indicate standard errors

 





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Crop Science
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Vadose Zone Journal
Journal of Plant Registrations Journal of
Environmental Quality
The Plant Genome
Copyright © 1999 by the Soil Science Society of America.