SSSAJ
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text Free
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (12)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Tomer, M.D.
Right arrow Articles by Green, S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Tomer, M.D.
Right arrow Articles by Green, S.
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Tomer, M.D.
Right arrow Articles by Green, S.

A Dielectric–Water Content Relationship for Sandy Volcanic Soils in New Zealand

M.D. Tomera, B.E. Clothierb, I. Vogelerb and S. Greenb

a New Zealand Forest Research Institute Ltd., Private Bag 3020, Rotorua, New Zealand (sponsoring organization)
b HortResearch, Ltd., Private Bag 11-030, Palmerston North, New Zealand



View larger version (20K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1 Map of North Island, New Zealand showing approximate locations of sampled profiles. The dashed line shows the general extent of volcanic soils (Molloy, 1988). Profiles 1 and 2 were in Whakarewarewa Forest, near Rotorua. Profile 3 was on the Whangaehu river floodplain, {approx}20 km south of Mount Ruapehu. Profile 4 was 5 km west of Kawerau, Profile 5 was 5 km southwest of Whangamata, and Profile 6 was 20 km north of Napier. Profile 7 is that sampled by Vogeler et al. 1996, where the soil is an ash-influenced loess

 


View larger version (22K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2 Ka{theta} calibration data for 17 of the 24 samples (circles) and data from Vogeler et al., 1996 (squares). The best fit, third-order polynomial (Eq. [4]) is also shown, along with the Topp equation (Eq. [1])

 


View larger version (23K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 3 Ka{theta} calibration data for two groups of coarser-textured samples, which consisted of three samples for each group. Best-fit calibration equations, Eq. [5] for the sand-textured soils (dotted line), and Eq. [6] for the gravel soils (dashed line), are also indicated. These groups show dielectric responses that are intermediate between the Topp equation (Eq. [1], lower solid line) and that of the finer ash soils (Eq. [4], upper solid line)

 





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Crop Science
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Vadose Zone Journal
Journal of Plant Registrations Journal of
Environmental Quality
The Plant Genome
Copyright © 1999 by the Soil Science Society of America.