SSSAJ
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published online 21 October 2009
Published in Soil Sci Soc Am J 73:2068-2077 (2009)
DOI: 10.2136/sssaj2008.0274
© 2009 Soil Science Society of America
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Woodbury, B. L.
Right arrow Articles by Spiehs, M. J.
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Woodbury, B. L.
Right arrow Articles by Spiehs, M. J.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Woodbury, B. L.
Right arrow Articles by Spiehs, M. J.
Related Collections
Right arrow Electromagnetic Induction, EMI
Right arrow Field evaluation techniques
Right arrow Animal Waste

SOIL & WATER MANAGEMENT & CONSERVATION

Electromagnetic Induction Sensor Data to Identify Areas of Manure Accumulation on a Feedlot Surface

Bryan L. Woodburya,*, Scott M. Leschb, Roger A. Eigenberga, Daniel N. Millerc and Mindy J. Spiehsa

a USDA-ARS, U.S. Meat Animal Research Center, P.O. Box 166, Clay Center, NE 68933
b Dep. of Environmental Science, Univ. of California, Riverside, CA 92521
c USDA-ARS, Agroecosystem Management Unit, 104 Chase Hall, Univ. of Nebraska, East Campus, Lincoln, NE 68583

* Corresponding author (bryan.woodbury{at}ars.usda.gov).

A study was initiated to test the validity of using electromagnetic induction (EMI) survey data, a prediction-based sampling strategy, and ordinary linear regression modeling to predict spatially variable feedlot surface manure accumulation. A 30- by 60-m feedlot pen with a central mound was selected for this study. A Dualem-1S EMI meter (Dualem Inc., Milton, ON, Canada) pulled on 2-m spacing was used to collect feedlot surface apparent electrical conductivity (ECa) data. Meter data were combined with global positioning system coordinates at a rate of five readings per second. Two 20-site sampling approaches were used to determine the validity of using EMI data for prediction-based sampling. Soil samples were analyzed for volatile solids (VS), total N (TN), total P (TP), and Cl. A stratified random sampling (SRS) approach (n = 20) was used as an independent set to test models estimated from the prediction-based (n = 20) response surface sample design (RSSD). The RSSD sampling plan demonstrated better design optimality criteria than the SRS approach. Excellent correlations between the EMI data and the ln(Cl), TN, TP, and VS soil properties suggest that it can be used to map spatially variable manure accumulations. Each model was capable of explaining >90% of the constituent sample variations. Fitted models were used to estimate average manure accumulation and predict spatial variations. The corresponding prediction maps show a pronounced pen design effect on manure accumulation. This technique enables researchers to develop precision practices to mitigate environmental contamination from beef feedlots.

Abbreviations: ECa, apparent electrical conductivity • EMI, electromagnetic induction • GPS, global positioning system • LR, linear regression • RSSD, response surface sampling design • SRS, stratified random sampling • TN, total nitrogen • TP, total phosphorus • VS, volatile solids







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Crop Science
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Vadose Zone Journal
Journal of Plant Registrations Journal of
Environmental Quality
The Plant Genome
Copyright © 2009 by the Soil Science Society of America.