SSSAJ Journal of Natural Resources and Life Sciences Education
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published online 19 August 2009
Published in Soil Sci Soc Am J 73:1693-1698 (2009)
DOI: 10.2136/sssaj2009.0037
© 2009 Soil Science Society of America
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Tolk, J. A.
Right arrow Articles by Evett, S. R.
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Tolk, J. A.
Right arrow Articles by Evett, S. R.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Tolk, J. A.
Right arrow Articles by Evett, S. R.
Related Collections
Right arrow Water Management
Right arrow Evapotranspiration
Right arrow Water Content

SOIL & WATER MANAGEMENT & CONSERVATION

Lysimetry versus Neutron Moisture Meter for Evapotranspiration Determination in Four Soils

Judy A. Tolk* and Steven R. Evett

USDA-ARS, Conservation and Production Research Lab., P.O. Drawer 10, Bushland, TX 79012

* Corresponding author (Judy.Tolk{at}ars.usda.gov).

Knowledge of evapotranspiration (ET) is vital for the management of our freshwater resources. One method for determining ET is through the measurement of the soil water balance, where ET is the residual calculated from the change in soil water storage plus precipitation and irrigation and minus drainage and runoff. The objective of this research was to compare the ET calculations where the change in soil water storage was measured using the neutron moisture meter (NMM), or ETNMM, vs. using weighing lysimeters (ETLYS) in four soils. Cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) was grown in 2006 and 2007 in weighing lysimeters with NMM access tubes and drainage systems. The soil textures ranged from fine sand to clay loam. The ETNMM was ≤4% of the ETLYS for the clay loam and sandy loam soils, but ETNMM was 8% less than ETLYS in the fine sand due to errors created by the timing of drainage and NMM measurements. At ETLYS amounts <50 mm, the difference between ETLYS and ETNMM for individual measurement intervals could be as much as 28 mm and the average ETNMM/ETLYS ratios as much as 1.20. Beyond 100 mm of ETLYS, the average ETNMM/ETLYS ratios became near 1.0 except for the fine sand, where unmeasured drainage out of the NMM sensor zone resulted in an underestimation of ET. When all other soil water balance components were quantified, a field-calibrated NMM accurately determined the change in soil water storage for the calculation of ET in three of the four soils.

Abbreviations: ET, evapotranspiration • ETLYS, ET with change in soil water storage determined using lysimetry • ETNMM, ET with change in soil water storage determined using the neutron moisture meter • NMM, neutron moisture meter







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Crop Science
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Vadose Zone Journal
Journal of Plant Registrations Journal of
Environmental Quality
The Plant Genome
Copyright © 2009 by the Soil Science Society of America.