SSSAJ Journal of Natural Resources and Life Sciences Education
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published online 14 July 2009
Published in Soil Sci Soc Am J 73:1453-1460 (2009)
DOI: 10.2136/sssaj2008.0082
© 2009 Soil Science Society of America
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Bittelli, M.
Right arrow Articles by Flury, M.
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Bittelli, M.
Right arrow Articles by Flury, M.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Bittelli, M.
Right arrow Articles by Flury, M.
Related Collections
Right arrow Soil Methods/Instrumentation
Right arrow Soil Hydrology
Right arrow Soil Physics

SOIL PHYSICS

Errors in Water Retention Curves Determined with Pressure Plates

Marco Bittellia,* and Markus Fluryb

a Dep. of AgroEnvironmental Science and Technology, Univ. of Bologna, Bologna, Italy
b Dep. of Crop and Soil Sciences, Washington State Univ., Pullman, WA 99164

* Corresponding author (marco.bittelli{at}unibo.it).

Pressure plates are commonly used to measure the soil water retention curve. Low plate and soil conductance, lack of plate–soil contact, and soil dispersion, however, make this method often unreliable at low water potentials. We investigated how errors in the determination of the water retention curve affect the soil hydraulic properties and the computation of plant-available water. We first determined soil water retention data for a silt loam soil using pressure plates only and a combination of pressure plates and a dew point meter. The two sets of soil water retention data were then analyzed using different models for describing the hydraulic properties. The soil water retention curves determined with the two methods deviated at potentials less than about –20 m H2O, with the pressure plate apparatus data yielding larger water contents than the dew point meter at the same water potentials. These results indicate that soil water retention curves determined from pressure plates may be in error at potentials less than –20 m H2O, which may lead to substantial errors in water flow calculations. These errors can be eliminated by using a combination of pressure plates and dew point measurements to determine the water retention curve.

Abbreviations: PPA, pressure plate apparatus only • PPADP, pressure plate apparatus plus dew point meter







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Crop Science
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Vadose Zone Journal
Journal of Plant Registrations Journal of
Environmental Quality
The Plant Genome
Copyright © 2009 by the Soil Science Society of America.