SSSAJ Journal of Natural Resources and Life Sciences Education
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published online 13 May 2009
Published in Soil Sci Soc Am J 73:1130-1136 (2009)
DOI: 10.2136/sssaj2007.0226
© 2009 Soil Science Society of America
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Lepore, B. J.
Right arrow Articles by Barak, P.
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Lepore, B. J.
Right arrow Articles by Barak, P.
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Lepore, B. J.
Right arrow Articles by Barak, P.
Related Collections
Right arrow Soil Methods/Instrumentation
Right arrow Laboratory Column Studies
Right arrow Lysimeter/Rhizosphere Studies

SOIL CHEMISTRY

A Colorimetric Microwell Method for Determining Bromide Concentrations

Brian J. Leporea,* and Phillip Barakb

a Biological Systems Engineering, Univ. of Wisconsin–Madison, 460 Henry Mall, Madison, WI 53706
b Dep. of Soil Science, Univ. of Wisconsin–Madison, 1525 Observatory Dr., Madison, WI 53706

* Corresponding author (bjlepore{at}wisc.edu).

Bromide is commonly used as a tracer in studies of water and chemical transport in soil and rock because it is relatively nonreactive with soil and rock constituents and because of its low environmental background concentrations. Based on a largely ignored modification of an American Public Health Association standard colorimetric method for determining Br using phenol red and chloramine-T(CT), we have corrected an internal error and recast the technique for use with 96-well microplates. Furthermore, the addition of thiosulfate to quench the undesirable chlorination reaction as previously published is shown to be unnecessary and even detrimental following the use of NH4+ to produce chloramine from excess Cl species. The method detection limit is 0.11 mg L–1 Br; negative interference with dissolved organic C can be addressed by either standard additions or solid-phase extraction with C18 sorbent. By reducing the sample size from 300 to 20 µL, the concentration range can be expanded from 12 mg L–1 Br to as much as 300 mg L–1 Br.

Abbreviations: CFS, crushed foundry slag • CT, chloramine-T • DOC, dissolved organic carbon • IC, ion chromatography • ISE, ion specific electrode • MDL, method detection limit • PR, phenol red • SPE, solid-phase extraction • TS, thiosulfate







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Crop Science
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Vadose Zone Journal
Journal of Plant Registrations Journal of
Environmental Quality
The Plant Genome
Copyright © 2009 by the Soil Science Society of America.