SSSAJ Journal of Natural Resources and Life Sciences Education
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published online 21 April 2009
Published in Soil Sci Soc Am J 73:952-960 (2009)
DOI: 10.2136/sssaj2008.0069
© 2009 Soil Science Society of America
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Olk, D.C.
Right arrow Articles by Isbell, C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Olk, D.C.
Right arrow Articles by Isbell, C.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Olk, D.C.
Right arrow Articles by Isbell, C.
Related Collections
Right arrow Rice
Right arrow Nitrogen
Right arrow Soil Biochemistry

SOIL BIOLOGY & BIOCHEMISTRY

Crop Nitrogen Uptake and Soil Phenols Accumulation under Continuous Rice Cropping in Arkansas

D.C. Olka,*, M.M. Andersb, T.R. Filleyc and C. Isbelld

a USDA-ARS, National Soil Tilth Lab., 2110 University Blvd., Ames, IA 50011-3120
b Univ. of Arkansas Rice Research & Ext. Center, 2900 Hwy. 130 E, Stuttgart, AR 72160
c Dep. of Earth and Atmospheric Sci., Purdue Univ., West Lafayette, IN 47907
d Zero Grade Farms, 732 Isbell Road, England, AR 72046

* Corresponding author (dan.olk{at}ars.usda.gov).

Soil C stocks in the Grand Prairie region of eastern Arkansas have declined under the prevalent 2-yr rotation of rice (Orzya sativa L.)–soybean [Glycine max (L.) Merr.]. Continuous rice cropping could promote soil C sequestration, but in previous work continuous rice averaged 19% less grain yield than rice following soybean, apparently due to N deficiency. To further study N cycling, microplots were imbedded during the rice phase of a crop rotation field study in 2002 and 2004. Urea labeled with 15N was applied preflood, when all N fertilizer is conventionally applied. Crop biomass was often smaller with continuous rice than with rice following soybean (sampled both years) and rice following corn (Zea mays L.) (sampled only in 2004), although the difference varied by growth stage. Crop uptake of native 14N, presumably mineralized from soil organic matter, was inhibited with continuous rice in both years. This trend was clearest at harvest (P = 0.02), when continuous rice averaged 40 kg 14N ha–1 less uptake than rice in the two rotations. Fertilizer 15N averaged only 30% of total crop N and its uptake differed among cropping treatments only in 2002. At harvest, soil C with continuous rice cropping was enriched by 42% with syringyl phenols and by 83% with cinnamic phenols compared with the rotations. These enrichments appear unrelated to estimated input rates of lignin-derived phenols. Results support the hypothesis that continuous rice cropping promotes the binding of soil N by lignin-derived phenols, thereby inhibiting N mineralization and late-season crop growth. Similar observations were reported for tropical rice production, suggesting that the responsible soil processes might be common in continuous rice cropping.

Abbreviations: DAE, days after crop emergence




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Soil Sci.Home page
D.C. Olk, R.R. Jimenez, E. Moscoso, and P. Gapas
Phenol Accumulation in a Young Humic Fraction following Anaerobic Decomposition of Rice Crop Residues
Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., May 1, 2009; 73(3): 943 - 951.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Crop Science
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Vadose Zone Journal
Journal of Plant Registrations Journal of
Environmental Quality
The Plant Genome
Copyright © 2009 by the Soil Science Society of America.