SSSAJ Journal of Natural Resources and Life Sciences Education
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published online 21 April 2009
Published in Soil Sci Soc Am J 73:919-927 (2009)
DOI: 10.2136/sssaj2008.0192
© 2009 Soil Science Society of America
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Doolette, A.L.
Right arrow Articles by Dougherty, W.J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Doolette, A.L.
Right arrow Articles by Dougherty, W.J.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Doolette, A.L.
Right arrow Articles by Dougherty, W.J.
Related Collections
Right arrow Phosphorus
Right arrow Nuclear Magnetic Resonance, NMR
Right arrow Soil Chemistry

SOIL CHEMISTRY

Spiking Improved Solution Phosphorus-31 Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Identification of Soil Phosphorus Compounds

A.L. Doolettea,*, R.J. Smernika and W.J. Doughertyb

a Soil and Land Systems, School of Earh and Environmental Sciences, Univ. of Adelaide, Waite Campus Urrbrae, SA 5064, Australia
b NSW Dep of Primary Industries, Locked Bag 4, Richmond, NSW, 2753, Australia

* Corresponding author (ashlea.doolette{at}adelaide.edu.au).

Chemical characterization of soil organic P using 31P nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) spectroscopy relies on the correct assignment of resonances. We examined eight Australian soils and identified the main orthophosphate monoester peaks by spiking model organic P compounds ({alpha}- and β-glycerophosphate, ethanolamine phosphate, phytate, scyllo-inositol hexakisphosphate, and choline phosphate) into NaOH–ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA) soil extracts. For five of the soils, the strongest monoester resonances were identified as being due to phytate, while for the other three soils, the strongest resonances were identified as being due to {alpha}- and β-glycerophosphate. Importantly, the appearance of spectra dominated by phytate and those dominated by glycerophosphate were deceptively similar because the separation between the two strongest phytate resonances was very similar to the separation between the {alpha}- and β-glycerophosphate resonances. We believe this may have resulted in the misidentification of these species in some previous studies. Identification of these species is hindered by the sensitivity of their chemical shifts to pH and electrolyte concentration. Our spiking methodology, in which we add only enough of the compound to approximately double the native concentration, overcomes this problem. We also investigated the alkaline hydrolysis of phospholipids as a likely source of {alpha}- and β-glycerophosphate. We found that the rate of phospholipid hydrolysis was dependant on NaOH concentration and that the presence of glycerophosphate resonances in soil extracts probably results from the extraction and redissolution procedures rather than the presence of native glycerophosphate in the soils. We also identified an intermediate diester product that may have previously been misidentified as the phospholipid itself.

Abbreviations: AMP, adenosine-5'-monophosphate • EDTA, ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid • NMR, nuclear magnetic resonance







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Crop Science
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Vadose Zone Journal
Journal of Plant Registrations Journal of
Environmental Quality
The Plant Genome
Copyright © 2009 by the Soil Science Society of America.