HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Figures Only Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Schwartz, R. C. Articles by Bell, J. M. Search for Related Content PubMed Articles by Schwartz, R. C. Articles by Bell, J. M. Agricola Articles by Schwartz, R. C. Articles by Bell, J. M. Related Collections Soil Methods/Instrumentation Water Content Time Domain Reflectometry, TDR

SOIL PHYSICS

Complex Permittivity Model for Time Domain Reflectometry Soil Water Content Sensing: I. Theory

^a USDA-ARS, Conservation and Production Research Lab., Bushland, TX 79012
^b USDA-ARS, Cropping Systems Research Lab., Lubbock, TX 79403

^* Corresponding author (robert.schwartz{at}ars.usda.gov).

Despite numerous applications of time-domain reflectometry (TDR), serious difficulties remain in estimating accurate soil water contents under field conditions, especially in fine-textured soils. We developed a physically based calibration model to predict the frequency- and temperature-dependent complex dielectric response of soils. The model was used to predict frequency-dependent attenuation and a single "effective" frequency approximation of apparent permittivity of the soil. Effective frequency was predicted to decline from 450 to 160 MHz as water contents increased from air dry to saturation. Predicted frequency decline was small for an input bandwidth of 130 MHz, reflecting that modeled polarization mechanisms associated with relaxation frequencies above 100 MHz were responsible for most of the frequency-dependent attenuation. For specific surface areas ranging from 150 to 300 m² g^–1, simulations indicate that ignoring dielectric and conductive losses or the associated decline in effective frequency results in a 5 to 22% underestimation of the apparent permittivity. Both the power-law and de Loor–Dobson mixing models gave a reasonable approximation to the measured apparent permittivity for a silty clay loam (34% clay) across the entire water content range. Moreover, the models were able to describe the behavior of apparent permittivity in response to temperature for two soils with contrasting bulk electrical conductivity contributions to losses. These results demonstrate that loss mechanisms and declines in effective frequency need to be considered to accurately predict the soil water content of fine-textured soils.

Abbreviations: dc, direct current • PDF, probability density function • TDR, time domain reflectometry

This article has been cited by other articles:

				R.C. Schwartz, S.R. Evett, and J.M. Bell Complex Permittivity Model for Time Domain Reflectometry Soil Water Content Sensing: II. Calibration Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., May 1, 2009; 73(3): 898 - 909. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]