HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Figures Only Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Kissel, D.E. Articles by Morris, L.A. Search for Related Content PubMed Articles by Kissel, D.E. Articles by Morris, L.A. Agricola Articles by Kissel, D.E. Articles by Morris, L.A. Related Collections Fate Nitrogen Nutrient Cycling

FOREST, RANGE & WILDLAND SOILS

Forest Floor Composition and Ammonia Loss from Urea in a Loblolly Pine Plantation

^a Dep. of Crop and Soil Sci. and Agric. and Environ., Services Lab. and School of Forest Resour., 2400 College Station Rd., Univ. of Georgia, Athens, GA 30602

^* Corresponding author (dkissel{at}uga.edu).

Surface application of urea to pine forests may lead to ammonia (NH₃) volatilization, which can reduce forest production. The objective of this study was to characterize urea reactions with the forest soil and to determine how various forest floor components interact with weather to affect NH₃ loss. Three field studies were performed in a midrotation loblolly pine (Pinus taeda L.) plantation with up to three treatments in each study, where NH₃ volatilization chambers were fertilized with 200 kg N ha^–1 that contained either (i) intact forest floor, (ii) forest floor removed by hand raking, or (iii) forest floor burned. In a complementary laboratory study, NH₃ loss was evaluated from cores comprised of: (i) mineral soil only, (ii) mineral soil + humus layer, (iii) mineral soil + humus + old needles, and (iv) mineral soil + humus + old needles + new needles. Loss of NH₃ in the field was generally greatest when urea was applied to a mineral soil with no forest floor, resulting in a loss of 53 and 59% of the applied N in two 29-d studies. Loss of NH₃ was intermediate from a complete forest floor (11 and 35% loss), and rates of loss appeared to be most affected by relative humidity. Losses were least from a recently burned forest floor (6 and 7% loss), due partly to slower urea hydrolysis. Loss of NH₃ in the laboratory study was also greater from the bare soil than from the complete forest floor. Retention of NH₄⁺ in the soil layers was related to the soil pH buffering capacity below pH 7. Because the humus layer was shown to have a large pH buffering capacity to retain NH₄⁺, these results suggest forest management that enhances humus formation should increase NH₄⁺ sorption and decrease NH₃ volatilization.

Abbreviations: CRH, critical relative humidity • DI, deionized • RH, relative humidity