HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Figures Only Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Liu, G. Articles by Du, S. Search for Related Content PubMed Articles by Liu, G. Articles by Du, S. GeoRef GeoRef Citation Agricola Articles by Liu, G. Articles by Du, S. Related Collections Soil Erosion Runoff Soil Conservation

SOIL & WATER MANAGEMENT & CONSERVATION

Determination of Soil Loss Tolerance of an Entisol in Southwest China

^a Inst. of Mountain Hazards and Environ. and Key Lab. of Mountain Hazards and Earth Surface Processes, Chinese Academy of Science and Ministry of Water Resources, Chengdu 610041, China
^b Inst. of Geographic Science and Natural Resources Research, Chinese Academy of Science, Beijing 100101, China
^c Dep. of Environmental Sciences, Univ. of California, Riverside, CA 92521

^* Corresponding author (Laowu{at}mail.ucr.edu).

Soil loss tolerance (T value) serves as an ultimate criterion for determining if erosion control measures are necessary to preserve long-term soil productivity; therefore, it must be determined scientifically and rationally. In this study, soil formation rates (SR) of the purple soils (Entisols in the U.S. Soil Taxonomy and Regosols in the FAO soil classification) in the hilly area of Sichuan, China, were determined in field plots (measured SR) for three treatments: (i) soil type (J₂s, J₃s, and J₃p soils) and parent materials or bedrock, (ii) vegetation (wheat [Triticum aestivum L.]–maize [Zea mays L.], loquat tree [Eriobotrya japonica (Thunb.) Lindl.], and perennial ryegrass [Lolium perenne L.]), and (iii) soil depth (10, 20, 40, and 60 cm). The measured values were further used to test the applicability of the Barth equation (estimated SR) for the test soils. The measured SR varied among the treatments as a result of different characteristics of soil parent materials (PM) and different temperature and soil moisture at the interface between the soil and the parent materials. The trends (the order of increase or decrease) of measured and estimated soil formation rates were the same, however, for the soil type and vegetation treatments, but not for the soil depth treatments. The measured SR values were 800 Mg km^–2 yr^–1 for J₃s purple soils and 1200 Mg km^–2 yr^–1 for J₂s and J₃p purple soils in the study region. The estimated SR values were closely related to runoff volumes but were substantially lower than the measured values. It was concluded that the Barth equation is not a reliable prediction model for estimating the soil formation rate for short-term and plot-scale observations. Therefore, T values should be determined by the measured SR values in the experimental region.

Abbreviations: T, soil loss tolerance • SR, soil formation rate • PM, parent material