SSSAJ Journal of Natural Resources and Life Sciences Education
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published online 21 January 2009
Published in Soil Sci Soc Am J 73:65-71 (2009)
DOI: 10.2136/sssaj2007.0418
© 2009 Soil Science Society of America
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Rakshit, S.
Right arrow Articles by Sposito, G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Rakshit, S.
Right arrow Articles by Sposito, G.
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Rakshit, S.
Right arrow Articles by Sposito, G.
Related Collections
Right arrow Humic Substances
Right arrow Redox Processes
Right arrow Soil Chemistry

SOIL CHEMISTRY

Iron(III) Bioreduction in Soil in the Presence of Added Humic Substances

Sudipta Rakshit*, Minori Uchimiya and Garrison Sposito

ESPM, Division of Ecosystem Sciences, 140 Mulford Hall, MC 3114, Univ. of California, Berkeley, CA 94720-3114

* Corresponding author (rakshits{at}nature.berkeley.edu).

Despite the broad consensus that humic substances (HS) can act as electron shuttles in bioreduction processes occurring in aquatic and terrestrial environments, no published studies have presented direct evidence that electron shuttling by HS plays a role in the mechanisms of Fe(III) bioreduction in soils. We conducted experiments in which two HS with very different chemical properties, a soil humic acid and a mixture of peat humic acid with aquatic organic matter, were added to an Ultisol and incubated under anoxic conditions to evaluate their effect on Fe(III) bioreduction by the indigenous microorganisms in the soil. Our experiments were designed to have the same initial reducing capacity available from the added HS but to have very different initial total carboxyl concentrations to examine the role of Fe(II) complexation by HS in the bioreduction process. The addition of HS significantly increased soluble Fe(II) production relative to that observed in control experiments without added HS. Moreover, after an initial period of incubation, soluble Fe(II) production was accelerated by the presence of a higher initial carboxyl content. These trends support the hypothesis that, at the initial stages of in Fe(III) bioreduction, electron shuttling dominates, whereas later Fe(II) complexation dominates. Our results apparently are the first to demonstrate directly that added HS can indeed enhance the bioreduction of Fe(III) minerals in soil by at least two different mechanisms.

Abbreviations: AQDS, anthraquinone-2,6-disulfonate • CRC, chemical reducing capacity • ESHA, Elliot soil humic acid • HS, humic substances • ICP, inductively coupled plasma • MRC, microbial reducing capacity • PPHA, Pahokee peat humic acid • SRNOM, Suwannee River natural organic matter







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Crop Science
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Vadose Zone Journal
Journal of Plant Registrations Journal of
Environmental Quality
The Plant Genome
Copyright © 2009 by the Soil Science Society of America.