HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Figures Only Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Christopher, S. F. Articles by Mishra, U. Search for Related Content PubMed Articles by Christopher, S. F. Articles by Mishra, U. Agricola Articles by Christopher, S. F. Articles by Mishra, U. Related Collections Soil Organic Matter Carbon Sequestration Tillage

SOIL & WATER MANAGEMENT & CONSERVATION

Regional Study of No-Till Effects on Carbon Sequestration in the Midwestern United States

^a Carbon Management and Sequestration Center, Room 210, School of Environment and Natural Resources, The Ohio State Univ., 2021 Coffey Rd., Columbus, OH 43210
^b current address: Great Lakes Center, Science Bldg., 261, Buffalo State College, 1300 Elmwood Ave., Buffalo, NY 14222

^* Corresponding author (christsf{at}buffalostate.edu).

No-till (NT) agriculture has been promoted as one of the optimal management practices that preserves soil and water, and increases soil organic C (SOC) compared with conventional tillage (CT) practices. Information on SOC sequestration in NT systems, however, has been based on measurements from the surface soil (<30 cm) and little is known about the extent of SOC sequestration in NT across the entire 0- to 60-cm soil profile. We conducted a regional study of NT farming to assess the extent of SOC sequestration in the whole soil profile across 12 contrasting but representative soils in the Midwestern United States, each within a Major Land Resource Area (MLRA: 98, 111C, 114B, 122 in Indiana; 111A, 111B, 111D, 124, and 126 in Ohio; and 127 and 147 in Pennsylvania). Soils on gentle terrain were sampled in paired NT and CT fields as well as in an adjacent woodlot in each MLRA. The SOC and N concentrations were greater in the surface 0- to 5-cm soil in NT than CT in MLRA 124. The SOC concentration in CT soil was greater than in NT soil at 10 to 30 cm in MLRAs 98 and 126. The total SOC pool for the whole soil profile did not differ between NT and CT in eight of the 12 MLRAs and the total profile SOC was actually greater under CT in MLRAs 98, 127, and 126, resulting in negative C sequestration rates on conversion from CT to NT in these three MLRAs. This regional study suggests that the entire soil profile must be examined and ecosystem C budget assessed when elucidating SOC sequestration in NT vs. CT fields.

Abbreviations: CT, conventional tillage • MLRA, Major Land Resource Area • MRCSP, Midwest Regional Carbon Sequestration Partnership • NT, no-till • SOC, soil organic carbon

This article has been cited by other articles:

				A.J. VandenBygaart Comments on "Regional Study of No-till Effects on Carbon Sequestration in the Midwestern United States" Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., June 29, 2009; 73(4): 1435 - 1435. [Full Text] [PDF]

				S. F. Christopher, R. Lal, and U. Mishra Response to "Comments on 'Regional Study of No-till Effects on Carbon Sequestration in the Midwestern United States'" Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., June 29, 2009; 73(4): 1436 - 1436. [Full Text] [PDF]