SSSAJ Journal of Natural Resources and Life Sciences Education
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published online 30 September 2008
Published in Soil Sci Soc Am J 72:1621-1627 (2008)
DOI: 10.2136/sssaj2007.0333
© 2008 Soil Science Society of America
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Jones, H. S.
Right arrow Articles by Oliver, G. R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Jones, H. S.
Right arrow Articles by Oliver, G. R.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Jones, H. S.
Right arrow Articles by Oliver, G. R.
Related Collections
Right arrow Carbon Sequestration
Right arrow Other Soil Management
Right arrow Forest Soils

FOREST, RANGE & WILDLAND SOILS

Impacts of Harvest Residue Management on Soil Carbon Stocks in a Plantation Forest

Haydon S. Jones*, Loretta G. Garrett, Peter N. Beets, Mark O. Kimberley and Graeme R. Oliver

Scion, Private Bag 3020, Rotorua, New Zealand

* Corresponding author (haydon.jones{at}scionresearch.com).

The impacts of plantation forest management on soil C stocks in New Zealand need to be better understood for the purposes of C accounting under the Kyoto Protocol. We investigated the impacts of three harvest residue management treatments on C and N stocks in a scoriaceous forest soil: whole-tree harvesting plus forest floor removal, whole-tree harvesting, and stem-only harvesting. Volumetric samples were collected from the forest floor and three mineral soil depth increments (0–0.1, 0.1–0.2, and 0.2–0.3 m) 16 to 17 yr after harvesting. Both fine (<2-mm) and coarse (>2-mm) fractions of the mineral soil were analyzed. No significant impacts on stocks of C and N were observed in the mineral soil fine fraction. Averaged across treatments, the 0- to 0.3-m mineral soil coarse fraction contained 5.2 ± 0.52 Mg C ha–1, representing 25% of total mineral soil C, with most derived from the fine-earth-coated scoria gravel. The inclusion of the coarse fraction stocks enabled the detection of significant treatment effects. Stem-only harvesting (residue retention) had significantly larger C stocks in the 0- to 0.1-m total mineral soil (fine + coarse fractions), forest floor, and total soil (forest floor + 0–0.3-m total mineral soil) pools than whole-tree harvesting (residue removal) plus forest floor removal. We recommend the retention of both harvest residues and forest floor materials for the maintenance of soil C stocks in plantation forests. Detection of residue management impacts on C stocks in soils with vesicular gravels may require analysis of the coarse fraction.

Abbreviations: FF, whole-tree harvesting plus forest floor removal • FH, fermented or humic • L, litter • OM, organic matter • SO, stem-only harvesting • WT, whole-tree harvesting







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Crop Science
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Vadose Zone Journal
Journal of Plant Registrations Journal of
Environmental Quality
The Plant Genome
Copyright © 2008 by the Soil Science Society of America.