HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Figures Only Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Dou, F. Articles by Hons, F. M. Search for Related Content PubMed Articles by Dou, F. Articles by Hons, F. M. Agricola Articles by Dou, F. Articles by Hons, F. M. Related Collections Crop Rotation Systems Soil Organic Matter Tillage

SOIL BIOLOGY & BIOCHEMISTRY

Sensitivity of Labile Soil Organic Carbon to Tillage in Wheat-Based Cropping Systems

^a Dep. of Plant Science, Univ. of California, Davis, CA 99775
^b Everglades Research and Education Center, Univ. of Florida, Belle Glade, FL 33430
^c Dep. of Soil and Crop Sciences, Texas A&M Univ., 2474 TAMU, College Station, TX 77843-2474

^* Corresponding author (fdou{at}ucdavis.edu).

To investigate the sensitivity of labile, or active, soil organic C (SOC), such as soil microbial biomass C (SMBC), mineralizable C, particulate organic matter C (POM C), dissolved organic C (DOC), and hydrolyzable C, to changes in management, we sampled soils in a 20-yr experiment with tillage (no-till [NT] and conventional tillage [CT]), cropping sequence, and N fertilization treatments in south-central Texas. Sensitivity is defined as how rapidly soil properties respond to changes in management. No-till significantly increased the size of SOC and all labile SOC pools compared with CT, especially at 0 to 5 cm. Intensified cropping also increased SOC and these labile pools, which generally decreased with depth. Labile pools were highly correlated with each other and SOC, but their slopes were significantly different, being lowest for DOC and highest for hydrolyzable C. In our study, SMBC was 5 to 8%, mineralized C was 2%, POM C was 14 to 31%, hydrolyzable C was 53 to 71%, and DOC was 1 to 2% of SOC. Model II orthogonal regression and simple linear regression both provided similar results, indicating that both methods were appropriate for evaluation of sensitivity to changes in management; however, using our proposed equation for sensitivity to tillage, no labile SOC pool was more sensitive than SOC. Further studies are needed to examine the effectiveness of this model.

Abbreviations: CT, conventional tillage • CW, continuous wheat • NT, no-till • POM C, particulate organic matter carbon • SMBC, soil microbial biomass carbon • SOC, soil organic carbon • SOM, soil organic matter • SWS, soybean–wheat–sorghum rotation • WS, double-cropped wheat–soybean

This article has been cited by other articles:

				R. L. Mulvaney, S. A. Khan, and T. R. Ellsworth Synthetic Nitrogen Fertilizers Deplete Soil Nitrogen: A Global Dilemma for Sustainable Cereal Production J. Environ. Qual., October 29, 2009; 38(6): 2295 - 2314. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]