SSSAJ Journal of Natural Resources and Life Sciences Education
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published online 20 August 2008
Published in Soil Sci Soc Am J 72:1382-1393 (2008)
DOI: 10.2136/sssaj2007.0232
© 2008 Soil Science Society of America
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hossler, K.
Right arrow Articles by Bouchard, V.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Hossler, K.
Right arrow Articles by Bouchard, V.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Hossler, K.
Right arrow Articles by Bouchard, V.
Related Collections
Right arrow Soil Physics

SOIL PHYSICS

The Joint Estimation of Soil Trace Gas Fluxes

Katie Hossler* and Virginie Bouchard

School of Environment and Natural Resources, The Ohio State Univ., Columbus, OH 43210

* Corresponding author (hossler.3{at}osu.edu).

Soil gas flux is commonly measured by monitoring the change in headspace gas concentration over time within a sealed compartment at the soil surface. Often, more than one trace gas is monitored at a time (e.g., CO2 and CH4), but the data fit separately. Flux estimates for CO2 and CH4 were obtained simultaneously by minimizing a weighted sum-of-squares error. The approximation of one model parameter for CH4, through theoretical relationship to the respective CO2 parameter, reduced the total parameter count by one and allowed for the joint estimation of one parameter using the combined CO2 and CH4 datasets. The method of joint optimization was compared with separate optimization for two nonlinear models, using both real and simulated data. The datasets were best fit with the jointly optimized models. Furthermore, the jointly optimized models more accurately estimated initial soil–air fluxes (simulated data only). The method of joint optimization is recommended as a means to apply better-fitting nonlinear models to typically small gas sample sets. This method is applicable to any number of trace gases monitored simultaneously.

Abbreviations: AIC, Akaike's information criterion • Exp, exponential model • Jnt, jointly fit optimization method • Lin, linear model • mn, squared-means weighting scheme • MOP, multi-objective optimization problem • NDFE and Ndfe, non-steady-state diffusive flux estimator • Sep, separately fit optimization method • ss, sum-of-squares error weighting scheme • SSE, sum-of-squares error • SSEw, weighted sum-of-squares error







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Crop Science
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Vadose Zone Journal
Journal of Plant Registrations Journal of
Environmental Quality
The Plant Genome
Copyright © 2008 by the Soil Science Society of America.