HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Figures Only Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Google Scholar Articles by Ebeling, A. M. Articles by Ebeling, D. D. PubMed Articles by Ebeling, A. M. Articles by Ebeling, D. D. Agricola Articles by Ebeling, A. M. Articles by Ebeling, D. D. Related Collections Phosphorus Soil Analysis Soil Fertility and Productivity

NUTRIENT MANAGEMENT & SOIL & PLANT ANALYSIS

Evaluating the Bray P1 Test on Alkaline, Calcareous Soils

^a Dep. of Soil Science, Univ. of Wisconsin-Madison, 1525 Observatory Dr., Madison, WI 53706
^b Dep. of Chemistry, Wisconsin Lutheran College, 8800 W. Wisconsin Ave., Milwaukee, WI 53226

^* Corresponding author (aebeling{at}nature.berkeley.edu).

Soil test phosphorus (STP) measurements are important for predicting crop P needs and for P loss risk assessments. Previous work indicates that the Bray P1 method extracts less P and does not correlate as well with Mehlich 3 or Olsen STP methods in alkaline or highly calcareous soils. This research was conducted to determine if the Bray P1 test is an appropriate method for the eastern red soil (ERS) region of Wisconsin, where pH typically ranges from 7 to 8 and soils are often calcareous. Soil samples (n = 113) from the ERS region and comparison soils (CS) from Iowa and Kansas (n = 38) with high pH and carbonate content were analyzed for P using the Bray P1, Mehlich 3, and Olsen methods and for soil pH and carbonate content. Results indicate that Bray P1 is strongly correlated with Olsen and Mehlich 3 for all samples in ERS regardless of carbonate content (R² = 0.83 and 0.98, respectively), but only weakly correlated to Olsen and Mehlich 3 for Iowa and Kansas soils with carbonate contents 5 g kg^–1 (R² = 0.01 and 0.08, respectively). Further investigation indicated that carbonate in CS is calcitic while in ERS it is dolomitic. Because dolomite reacts much more slowly than calcite, Bray P1 is not neutralized in ERS during the 5 min extraction time. For soil with unknown carbonate content, a pH measurement on the Bray P1 filtrate can identify samples where Bray P1 is neutralized and an alternative P extractant should be used.

Abbreviations: CEC, cation exchange capacity • CS, comparison soil • ERS, eastern red soil • IC, inorganic carbon • STP, soil test phosphorus • %BCS, percent base cation saturation