HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Figures Only Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Google Scholar Articles by Moebius-Clune, B. N. Articles by Lucey, R. PubMed Articles by Moebius-Clune, B. N. Articles by Lucey, R. Agricola Articles by Moebius-Clune, B. N. Articles by Lucey, R. Related Collections Tillage

SOIL & WATER MANAGEMENT & CONSERVATION

Long-Term Effects of Harvesting Maize Stover and Tillage on Soil Quality

^a Dep. of Crop and Soil Sciences, Cornell Univ., Ithaca, NY 14853-1901
^b Dep. of Plant Pthology, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 14853-1901
^c Dep. of Horticulture, Cornell Univ., Ithaca, NY 14853-1901
^d Dep. of Plant Pathology, New York State Agricultural Experiment Station, 630 W. North St., Geneva, NY 14456

^* Corresponding author (bnm5{at}cornell.edu).

Rising concerns about greenhouse gases, increased fuel prices, and the potential for new high value agricultural products have raised interest in the use of maize stover for bioenergy production. However, residue harvest must be weighed against potential negative impacts on soil quality. This study, conducted in Chazy, NY, evaluated the long-term effects of 32 yr of maize (Zea mays L.) stover harvest vs. stover return on soil quality in the surface layer (5–66 mm) under plow till (PT) and no-till (NT) systems on a Raynham silt loam (coarse-silty, mixed, active, nonacid, mesic Aeric Epiaquept) using physical, chemical, and biological soil properties as soil quality indicators. Twenty-five soil properties were measured, including standard chemical soil tests, aggregate stability (WSA), bulk density, (_b) penetration resistance (PR), saturated hydraulic conductivity (K_s), infiltrability (Infilt), several porosity indicators (aeration pores(PO > 1000), soil water potential = > –0.36 kPa; air-filled pores at field capacity (PO > 30), > –10kPa; available water capacity (AWC), –1500 < < –10 kPa), total organic matter (OM), parasitic (Nem_parasitic) and beneficial nematode (Nem _beneficial) populations, decomposition rate (Decomp), potentially mineralizable N (PMN) and easily extractable (EEG) and total glomalin (TG). Only eight indicators were adversely affected by stover harvest, and most of these effects were significant only under NT. Almost all indicators affected by stover removal were affected equally or more adversely by tillage. A total of 15 indicators were adversely affected by tillage. Results of this study suggest that, on a silt loam soil in a temperate climate, long-term stover harvest had lower adverse impacts on soil quality than long-term tillage. Stover harvest appears to be sustainable when practiced under NT management.

Abbreviations: _b, bulk density • AWC, available water capacity • Decomp, cellulose decomposition rate • EEG, easily extractable glomalin concentration • K_s, saturated hydraulic conductivity • lnK_s, ln(K_s + 1) • Infilt, infiltrability • NT, no-till • NT-H, NT stover harvested • NT-R, NT stover returned • Nem_Beneficial, number of beneficial nematodes • Nem_Parasitic, number of parasitic nematodes • OM, organic matter • PMN, potentially mineralizable nitrogen • PO > 30, pores with diam. > 30 µm • PO > 1000, pores with diam. > 1000 µm • PR, penetration resistance • PT, plow till • PT-H, PT stover harvested • PT-R, PT stover returned • SOC, soil organic carbon;TG, total glomalin concentration • WSA, water-stable aggregation (0.25–2.00 mm).